If you are interested, why don't you try and see the results with your
very own eyes :-)
But please take note, that it contains asm codes, so BCC without TASM
will not be able to compile it.
Ok, just tried. Speedtst shows about 20% faster. But my FWH apps GPFs. Maybe
I have to recompile FWH
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 08:29:43 -0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andi,
Thanks,
As Enrico says, your code is really fast, but FWH GPF...
Toninho,
You have to be sure what alignment you are using for FWH Libs and your
application. All _SHOULD_ be recompiled with the same
Toninho,
You have to be sure what alignment you are using for FWH Libs and your
application. All _SHOULD_ be recompiled with the same alignment.
Hi Andi, thanks,
Recompiling all FWH and it works with -a8
Regards,
Toninho.
Andi
MSVC do the memcpy optimization when use maximum optimize switch. -O2 or
-Ox or -Ogty
You can generate .asm using -Fa switch.
Walter Negro
Andi Jahja escribió:
Hi Toninho,
In my test, MSVC9 is a lot faster than BCC 6.10.
BTW, can you please make a test as follows:
1. Run
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: Andi Jahja [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Xharbour-Developers xharbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Data invio: venerdì 28 novembre 2008 23.17
Oggetto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] C Compiler for Windows, a simple review
Hi
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:43:02 +0100
Enrico Maria Giordano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. Can you report the result here, please?
If you are interested, why don't you try and see the results with your
very own eyes :-)
But please take note, that it contains asm codes, so BCC without TASM
Compiler for Windows, a simple review
If you are interested, why don't you try and see the results with your
very own eyes :-)
But please take note, that it contains asm codes, so BCC without TASM
will not be able to compile it.
Ok, just tried. Speedtst shows about 20% faster. But my FWH apps GPFs
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:04:54 +0100
Miguel Angel Marchuet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's a little dangerous to use hard coded size of HB_ITEM
It's not a little, but VERY dangerous but written especially for 8 byte
alignment ;-)
BTW, many times ago it was said that an alignment of 4 is
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: Andi Jahja [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: Xharbour-Developers xharbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Data invio: venerdì 28 novembre 2008 12.30
Oggetto: [xHarbour-developers] C Compiler for Windows, a simple review
This information is posted merely to share my
What I use:
Based on several considerations, I am now using MSVS 9.0 as my work horse,
although the compiling speed is very slow compared to BCC 5.5.1.
MSVS 9.0 (Express) is free, code speed is excellent, support/continuity is
more or less obvious.
Thanks for tests Andi.
Do you have
: Re: [xHarbour-developers] C Compiler for Windows, a simple review
What I use:
Based on several considerations, I am now using MSVS 9.0 as my work
horse,
although the compiling speed is very slow compared to BCC 5.5.1.
MSVS 9.0 (Express) is free, code speed is excellent, support
Toninho
I have bcc 6.10, but personaly i dont like msvc compiler
Ok Luiz, thank you.
Regards,
Toninho.
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based
12 matches
Mail list logo
