Re: [xHarbour-developers] More on the _hb_vmProcessSymbols error

2010-01-09 Thread Luis Krause Mantilla
ase explain what did you intend with that change? >> >> Ron >> >> ------ >> From: "Luis Krause Mantilla" >> Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 11:42 PM >> To: "Xharbour-Developers" >> S

Re: [xHarbour-developers] More on the _hb_vmProcessSymbols error

2010-01-09 Thread Andi Jahja
end with that change? > > Ron > > -- > From: "Luis Krause Mantilla" > Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 11:42 PM > To: "Xharbour-Developers" > Subject: [xHarbour-developers] More on the _hb_vmProcessSymbols error > > > Up to c

Re: [xHarbour-developers] More on the _hb_vmProcessSymbols error

2010-01-08 Thread Ron Pinkas
, can you please explain what did you intend with that change? Ron -- From: "Luis Krause Mantilla" Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 11:42 PM To: "Xharbour-Developers" Subject: [xHarbour-developers] More on the _hb_vmProcessSy

[xHarbour-developers] More on the _hb_vmProcessSymbols error

2010-01-07 Thread Luis Krause Mantilla
Up to changelog 1.6665, xharbour builds fine: 2009-12-29 23:00 UTC+0700 Andi Jahja It's after this date that the _hb_vmProcessSymbols appears, at least for Borland 5.5.1. -- Luis Krause Mantilla lkrausem at shaw dot ca luis_krause at hotmail dot com "May the Source be with GNU"