Re: [xHarbour-developers] Problem with Andi's ace32.c approach

2008-05-31 Thread bhays
-Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Andi Jahja > Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 8:17 AM > To: 'xHarbour-Developers' > Subject: Re: [xHarbour-developers] Problem with Andi's ace32.c approach > > Brian: > >

Re: [xHarbour-developers] Problem with Andi's ace32.c approach

2008-05-31 Thread Andi Jahja
Brian: > When I discussed this issue with Ron, he was of the opinion that > this module could be auto-generated from the DLL itself, thus > eliminating the maintenance issues in pursuing things like this. I supposed you are referring to ace32.lib to be linked. Yes, of course, it was what it used

Re: [xHarbour-developers] Problem with Andi's ace32.c approach

2008-05-31 Thread bhays
08 6:40 AM > To: Xharbour-Developers > Subject: Re: [xHarbour-developers] Problem with Andi's ace32.c approach > > Luis and All: > > It's a known issue with Borland, but _not_ with all other compilers. > I would suggest that those who have bought ADS to enquire ADS/Sybase

Re: [xHarbour-developers] Problem with Andi's ace32.c approach

2008-05-31 Thread Andi Jahja
Luis and All: It's a known issue with Borland, but _not_ with all other compilers. I would suggest that those who have bought ADS to enquire ADS/Sybase on this matter. FYI, what I did is based on documented reference, ace.h. There we can find prototypes and variable definition/typedefs implemented

[xHarbour-developers] Problem with Andi's ace32.c approach

2008-05-30 Thread Luis Krause Mantilla
Ron, all: I apologize for the long message but there's some important issues that need to be solved. We've found a problem with Andi's approach of using ace32.c he coded instead of the previous Implib approach for ace32.dll. We're currently building our app with v 8.1 dlls. One of the test fold