Hi Przemek, :-)
As always your input is greatly appreciated. I am sure I speak for everyone
when I invite you to post fixes to problems you recognize. It probably would
have taken you less time to fix the -gc3 omissions than writing this message.
:-) In such cases it is more productive to simp
Yes.
On Jul 8, 2015 2:41 PM, "Andi Jahja" wrote:
> Yes it is, -gc3 is to produce C source. I think the bug is there, not in
> the VM engine. So, not using -gc3 may perhaps cure the problem.
>
> Andi
>
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:35:52 -0700
> Ron Pinkas wrote:
>
> > I am not by my computer, -gc3 is
+1
I confirm that not using -gc3, the following snippet works fine:
#include "hbclass.ch"
proc main()
local i
for i := 1 to 100
begin sequence
with object i
if i < 100
break
I am not by my computer, -gc3 is the switch to generate C calls instead of
PCODE?
On Jul 8, 2015 2:23 PM, "Andi Jahja" wrote:
> Hi Ron:
>
> Sorry for I cannot post a reduced code. The application is quite huge and
> I do not know where it happened.
> Yes, I am using -gc3, but not aware where the
Yes it is, -gc3 is to produce C source. I think the bug is there, not in the VM
engine. So, not using -gc3 may perhaps cure the problem.
Andi
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:35:52 -0700
Ron Pinkas wrote:
> I am not by my computer, -gc3 is the switch to generate C calls instead of
> PCODE?
> On Jul 8, 20
Hi Ron:
Sorry for I cannot post a reduced code. The application is quite huge and I do
not know where it happened.
Yes, I am using -gc3, but not aware where the recursion is. IMO, Przemek's
example should demonstrate it.
Andi
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:15:25 -0700
Ron Pinkas wrote:
> Hi Andi,
>
Hi Andi,
Could you kindly post a reduced sample?
As long as you are not using -gc3 (as per Przemek observation) and/or recursion
which exceeds the fixed limit, then I am not aware of such issue.
Ron
> On Jun 30, 2015, at 6:13 AM, Andi Jahja wrote:
>
> Hi Przemek,
>
> Many thanks for explana
Hi Przemek,
Many thanks for explanation. Fixing it is beyond my capabilities. For the time
being, xHarbour users have to be careful when playing with With-Object and/or
For-Each constructs.
Andi
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 13:45:41 +0200
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Andi Jahja w
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Andi Jahja wrote:
Hi,
> Hello,
> I randomly get this error message:
>"WITH OBJECT excessive nesting!"
> As per default build, HB_MAX_WITH_OBJECT is preset to 64.
> But I am very sure that my application does not have that much nests.
> This occurs when I repeatedly execut
9 matches
Mail list logo
