[xHarbour-developers] ChangeLog: 2010-01-01 15:45 UTC+0700 Andi Jahja

2010-01-01 Thread Andi Jahja
2010-01-01 15:45 UTC+0700 Andi Jahja * source/compiler/harbour.slx * source/macro/macro.slx * source/ct/envparam.c * source/ct/numlohi.c ! use secured function for MSVS2005 and greater * makefile.vc - remove -D_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE flag Now at least the compiler and cor

[xHarbour-developers] Harbour vs xHarbour - SpeedTest

2010-01-01 Thread Andi Jahja
Hi All, The folowing report may be interesting: Harbour speed now doubles xHarbour. Is there any idea to improve this situation. Thanks and Happy New Year To All. -- Andi 2010.01.01 18:37:50 Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 Harbour 2.0.0 (Rev. 13372) Microsoft Visual C++ 14.00.50727 (32-bit)

Re: [xHarbour-developers] Harbour vs xHarbour - SpeedTest

2010-01-01 Thread Patrick Mast, xHarbour.
Hey Andi, Thanks for the test. I'm also VERY interested in a more speedy xHarbour! Happy new year. ;-) Patrick On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Andi Jahja wrote: > Hi All, > > The folowing report may be interesting: > Harbour speed now doubles xHarbour. > Is there any idea to improve this situa

Re: [xHarbour-developers] Harbour vs xHarbour - SpeedTest

2010-01-01 Thread Andi Jahja
Hi Patrick, Yes, me too, very interested in a speedy xHarbour. I have yet to test amalgamation of VM functions, and will report in due time. -- Andi On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:54:49 +0100 "Patrick Mast, xHarbour." wrote: > Hey Andi, > > Thanks for the test. I'm also VERY interested in a more spee