Re: [xHarbour-developers] RDD changes

2009-07-01 Thread Miguel Angel Marchuet
I'm agree. Is absurd to make changes of this magnitude because it involves many hours of work for others. And in this case the change is not always justified in any case. ( the massive use of const, or add unused var to structures for all compilers) I think that in such cases, if there

Re: [xHarbour-developers] RDD changes

2009-06-30 Thread Miguel Angel Marchuet
Please, don't upload any change in this moment. I'm finishing some relevant changes at rdd subsystem.. 1) Session subsystem. 2) Transactional subsystem for all rdd. 3) header lock info and others ... ;) Best regards, Miguel Angel Marchuet Patrick Mast, xHarbour. escribió: Hello, I saw on

Re: [xHarbour-developers] RDD changes

2009-06-30 Thread Luiz Rafael Culik Guimaraes
this changes in my opinion, is to make more incompatible the api for developers No technical merit in these changes then? Im not discussing merit, but compatility. One os the changes, has break hwgui ( the new hb_parv*/hb_storv*) Now imaging how many 3rd parties has to have two version of