Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-10 Thread Patrick Mast
Hey Luiz, If the changes are necessary or make xHarbour better, than we should keep the changes. It seems these changes need an increase of PCode level, right? PCode increase is a serious matter in my opinion. All PRG’s in user’s code AND 3rd party products need to be recompiled. *IF* we can

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-10 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
Il 10/10/2016 16:23, Rafael Culik ha scritto: > Patrick > > I can revert the new parameter and still has the fix Great! Looks as the best solution. EMG -- http://www.emagsoftware.it http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-10 Thread Patrick Mast
Hey Luiz,I can revert the new parameter and still has the fix Thanks! But, please, try to reply in more than just two words ;-) What is it exactly you changed? What will be reverted? Can you explain the change?

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-10 Thread Patrick Mast
Thank you Luiz!  Patrick On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Rafael Culik wrote: Patrick Ok. Ill commit tonight. Sorry for few words. New phone Regards Luiz Em 10 de out de 2016 11:27, "Patrick Mast" < patrick.m...@xharbour.com [patrick.m...@xharbour.com] > escreveu: Hey

[xHarbour-developers] Changelog 2016-10-10 22:05 UTC-0300 Luiz Rafael Culik <l...@xharbour.com.br>

2016-10-10 Thread Luiz Rafael Culik
* contrib/gtwvw/gtwvw.c ! fixed call to HB_TRACE() macro in hb_gt_FuncInit function. was passing an diferent name of parameter found when compiling with -DHB_TR_LEVEL=HB_TR_DEBUG * source/rdd/dbf1.c * source/rdd/dbf1net.c ! fixed call to HB_TRACE() macro in