Having trouble setting up relay blocking in
XMail.
I can get it block relaying, by IP address, but I
can get it to block by domain.
say that thehandled domain list on the server
is:
abc.com
def.com
With relay blocking, a user can send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone...
I am just thinking outloud here... but as XMail is really beginning to
mature (maybe a version 1.0 somewhere on the distant horizon?), I have an
idea to throw out here.
I am working on a CFX tag (for cold fusion) to interface with the control
server... (tag written in Java)...
Guys,
this weekend I'll post 0.71-pre01 with these new features :
Date 29-04-2001 0.71
Removed the SERVER.TAB variable HeloUseRootDomain and introduced a new
one HeloDomain to specify the name to send as HELO domain ( look at
variable documentation ).
If HeloDomain is not
John, ask your users to use authentication with smtp sessions, and then
relay starts (if their client software allow smtp authtication)
Suggestion to Davide : Since not all users have a mail client software with
smtp authentication, is it possible to add a new method of authentication
based on
On 11-May-2001 Dave Palmer wrote:
Hello everyone...
I am just thinking outloud here... but as XMail is really beginning to
mature (maybe a version 1.0 somewhere on the distant horizon?), I have an
idea to throw out here.
I am working on a CFX tag (for cold fusion) to interface with the
On 11-May-2001 John Kielkopf wrote:
Yes, but it's an unfortunate necessity.
In order to allow my users to use my SMTP service, I either need to open up
all relaying, or setup smtpauth, since most of them are mobile. smtpauth
just wont cut the mustard in this situation, since I'm not about
I do see your point :)
But... using XML to parse messages (I am ***only*** talking about the
messaging component of the control server) would require... oh something
like 12 lines of code (in java) using something like Xerces (from Apache).
And, as one's own prerogative to change things...
On 11-May-2001 CLEMENT Francis wrote:
John, ask your users to use authentication with smtp sessions, and then
relay starts (if their client software allow smtp authtication)
Suggestion to Davide : Since not all users have a mail client software with
smtp authentication, is it possible to
On 11-May-2001 Dave Palmer wrote:
I do see your point :)
But... using XML to parse messages (I am ***only*** talking about the
messaging component of the control server) would require... oh something
like 12 lines of code (in java) using something like Xerces (from Apache).
That would
On 11-May-2001 Lex Kneefel wrote:
Sorry this is the 2nd time I send this. Now with the right subject.
Hi,
In XMail it's possible to limit the size of individual mailboxes. Is it
possible to restrict the total size for all mail in a domain?
We want to offer unlimited pop
Yet Another Web Mail Interface :
http://nullwebmail.sourceforge.net/
- Davide
Well, having no other choice, I'll have totry
the SMTP Auth route.
However, it appears when authenticating, the user's
domain is not pulled from SMTPS.szSvrDomain, so you need to supply the full
username and domain when authenticating. Is this correct?
On 11-May-2001 John Kielkopf wrote:
Well, having no other choice, I'll have to try the SMTP Auth route.
However, it appears when authenticating, the user's domain is not pulled from
SMTPS.szSvrDomain, so you need to supply the full username and domain when
authenticating. Is this correct?
Well, actually, I finally got POP3 working with reverse lookup, so I no
longer needed to provide the domain in the user field. (needed to get a
patch from MS, part of SP2)
I just finished modifying SMTPSvr.cpp to work the same, now that I'll be
forced to use SMTP Auth... Didn't want to waste
On 11-May-2001 John Kielkopf wrote:
Well, actually, I finally got POP3 working with reverse lookup, so I no
longer needed to provide the domain in the user field. (needed to get a
patch from MS, part of SP2)
I just finished modifying SMTPSvr.cpp to work the same, now that I'll be
forced
On 11-May-2001 John Kielkopf wrote:
Well, actually, I finally got POP3 working with reverse lookup, so I no
longer needed to provide the domain in the user field. (needed to get a
patch from MS, part of SP2)
I just finished modifying SMTPSvr.cpp to work the same, now that I'll be
On 11-May-2001 John Kielkopf wrote:
On 11-May-2001 John Kielkopf wrote:
Well, actually, I finally got POP3 working with reverse lookup, so I no
longer needed to provide the domain in the user field. (needed to get a
patch from MS, part of SP2)
I just finished modifying SMTPSvr.cpp to
Have You tried to use ORBS as spam protection ?
I have:
RBL-MAPSCheck 1
RSS-MAPSCheck 1
ORBS-MAPSCheck 1
In server.tab, if thats what you mean.
Reverse lookup won't do you any good for people on the road connecting
from various locations. SMTP Auth is your only choice right now.
Bill
--
From: John Kielkopf[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 2:26 PM
To:Davide Libenzi
Cc:XMail Mailing list
Subject:
On 11-May-2001 John Kielkopf wrote:
Have You tried to use ORBS as spam protection ?
I have:
RBL-MAPSCheck 1
RSS-MAPSCheck 1
ORBS-MAPSCheck 1
In server.tab, if thats what you mean.
This will protect You against registered spammers.
Anyway, since I'm definitely dumb and I'm locked out
Reverse lookup keeps the user from having to enter user@domain in the user
fields for POP3 (and now SMTP on the version I modded up for my own use).
It simplifies configuration for users that that have a hard enough time
finding the any key.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Healy [EMAIL
On 10-May-2001 Bob Hugel wrote:
Good Morning Davide,
I have been using your XMail product for about a week or two now with great
success. You've gone a GREAT job,.. and an even bigger thanks for making
the source code available...
I just want to let you know that I think there is a
On 05-May-2001 John Kielkopf wrote:
Not a huge problem, but slightly annoying.
Finally got reverse lookup working under Windows 2000, but now SMTP will
reply 989081168.1272@com instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED].
0.71 will show the full FQDN w/o stripping the host part.
- Davide
23 matches
Mail list logo
