Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Memchecker runs now on the main server. I'll let it run until RSS is
40MB.
And then upgrade the server :-)
The problem is that if RSS goes over X, the system just kills XMail process,
no matter if you have 40 MB or GB RAM :/
You must have missed earlier messages of
You must have missed earlier messages of Davide then. You should
upgrade your glibc library on that machine.
glibc-2.2.4-13
glibc-common-2.2.4-13
glibc-devel-2.2.4-13
gcc-2.96-98
--
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Sönke Ruempler
Technik
top concepts Internetmarketing GmbH
Am Steinkamp 7 -
Please update to sa_filter2 or ba_filter. The original sa_filter misses =
some
mails when spamd is too busy.
http://xmail.marketmix.com/downloads/sa_filter2.zip
http://xmail.beaucox.com/
--Harald
-Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
Hello,
is that any way how to force xmail (on windows) to deliver mails faster?
During the day, xmail queue manager shows about=20
1500 sending messages + 1400 resending (because of mail address errors
etc.).
It takes *SO LONG* time after the xmail accepts a mail via SMTP (and
puts it
in the
Jan Rovner pravi:
Hello,
is that any way how to force xmail (on windows) to deliver mails faster?
During the day, xmail queue manager shows about=20
1500 sending messages + 1400 resending (because of mail address errors
etc.).
It takes *SO LONG* time after the xmail accepts a mail via
This sounds like dns problems.
There should be no DNS problems, there are no firewalls, server is=20
connected directly to the backbone.=20
SmartDNSHost 195.28.64.119:udp, 195.28.64.119:tcp
DNS server is provided by the ISP, I've tried to use my own
Microsoft DNS server (127.0.0.1) but it did
Tweak the resend cycle:
-Qi ratio
Set the increment ratio of the reschedule time in =
sending a
messages. At every failure in delivery a message, =
reschedule
time T is incremented by (T / ratio), therefore :
T(i) =3D
You might find that the udp/tcp on your SmartDNSHost is the problem.
DNS queries are done via UDP
DNS zone transfers are done via TCP
You might find that because you are not defined as a valid secondary Name
Server for any zones on your ISPs DNS server, you will be blocked on TCP/53.
I recommend
Thank all for the support !
Increasing SMAIL thread count and decreasing=20
retries (probably :-)) solved the problem:
-Qr 3 -Qn 100
Now, the xmail.exe process is taking some CPU :-) and queue=20
looks almost empty.
Regads,
Jan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Toby Reiter pravi:
All,
I find that mail that gets relayed through my backup MX does not
always get caught by SpamAssassin. Does anyone have a similar
experience? Does anyone have any hints about why this might happen?
I'm using the Drake's SA_Filter, which works absolutely beautifully
Please update to sa_filter2 or ba_filter. The original sa_filter misses =
some
mails when spamd is too busy.
http://xmail.marketmix.com/downloads/sa_filter2.zip
http://xmail.beaucox.com/
Hmmm...how did i miss sa_filter2? I've been watching the list pretty
closely -- I must have missed it being
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote:
I have a filter that runs XAV, both in fiters.in and filters.out.
The line in the filters.*.tab is:
**0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0av.tab
(Yes, real tabs, don't worry.)
av.tab says:
c:\xav\xav.exec:\xav@@FILE@@FROM@@RCPT20
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
is it possible to filter out RCPT TO lines in a SMTP filter (if there are
more then one lines) so that I can change the recipient list?
Yes. I need to check what happens if you leave the list empty though ...
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
You must have missed earlier messages of Davide then. You should
upgrade your glibc library on that machine.
=20
glibc-2.2.4-13
glibc-common-2.2.4-13
glibc-devel-2.2.4-13
gcc-2.96-98
Remember to shut down the server cleanly
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Jan Rovner wrote:
Hello,
is that any way how to force xmail (on windows) to deliver mails faster?
During the day, xmail queue manager shows about=20
1500 sending messages + 1400 resending (because of mail address errors
etc.).
This is a clear DNS problem. Can you
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Toby Reiter wrote:
messages for SPAM (if only there was a way to prevent mail from being
scanned twice).
Add an header in the message.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I have a filter that runs XAV, both in fiters.in and filters.out.
The line in the filters.*.tab is:
**0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0av.tab
(Yes, real tabs, don't worry.)
av.tab says:
c:\xav\xav.exec:\xav@@FILE@@FROM@@RCPT20
But still xav.log shows
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote:
So if I have a domain, say redir.com, thatall addresses under it are
redirectors to somewhere else, and I set a filter for [EMAIL PROTECTED], it
would never ever run, right?
If so, what *can* I do to run a filter for [EMAIL PROTECTED] if it is all
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote:
So if I have a domain, say redir.com, thatall addresses under it are
redirectors to somewhere else, and I set a filter for [EMAIL PROTECTED], it
would never ever run, right?
If so, what *can* I do to run a filter for [EMAIL
19 matches
Mail list logo
