Hi all,
I've installed 2 instances of XMAIL on a single windows server by following
up some archive threads. Overall I created Xmail2 registry entry and
executable, and registered it as a 2nd server, which uses its own MailRoot
and IP settings.
Both services run just fine (no visible errors),
I am curious: Why two instances of XMail?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Lugassy
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 5:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Problem with multiple instances
Hi all,
I've installed 2
Isn't it the only way to have 2 completely different mailers for 2
different applications?
Assuming I have 2 projects hosted on a single server and I want outgoing
mail to be specifically marked as coming from domain1 or domain2 , do I have
any other option?
-Original Message-
From:
If you have two instances of any applications running, they can't both
be sharing the same ports, so, POP3 could be port 110 for 1 of the
instances and then some other port for the other instance, and SMTP
could be port 25 for one of the instances and some other port for the
other instance.
Thanks Jeff, this seems logical.
Is there any way to process an outgoing message and change its headres to
contain the domain2 properties (i.e - different mail.domain2.com)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Buehler
Sent: Sunday,
I don't know of any, but there might be. Possibly filters.out.tab, so
that an app/script modifies the header as an outbound filter. If it
were possible to modify the outbound headers completely then it seems
like that might be useful to spammers?
Michael Lugassy wrote:
Thanks Jeff, this
Of course, you could also modify the XMail code on your system and
recompile it. A solution like that would probably be clumsy, though,
requiring something like several new tab files that would contain the
domains that belong to the normal domain with header, and the domains
that should use
David,
But why fail the first time? Nonetheless, there's a clear ESMTP protocol =
to address exactly this problem. You save bandwidth, save resources on =
the SMTP server and G-d knows what else.
My C++ knowledge is pretty rusty or else I would have done this myself. =
Haven't touched a C code
For performance reasons, I would really like to see this feature =
integrated
into XMail rather than doing it through an out of process filter. I =
realize
this is less of an issue on Linux, but spawning additional processes =
under
Windows does result in a performance hit. If the interface for
I see what you are trying to do. However, I think you will run into =
more
trouble if you could actually do that. XMail needs to call itself the =
name
the server's IP will reverse dns lookup to. That is the important check
done by those somewhat outdated spam filtering dns checks. I have
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 22:07:25 +0200, =D7=A0=D7=95=D7=A8 =D7=93=D7=90=D7=95=
=D7=93 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
=20
But why fail the first time? Nonetheless, there's a clear ESMTP protocol =
=3D
to address exactly this problem. You save bandwidth, save resources on =
=3D
the SMTP server and
All the big names support, including: Postfix, sendmail and Qmail.
Xmail can and should included in that list of MTA's that support the =
so-called pipelining.
Noor
-Original Message-
From: Brian Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 6:15 AM
To: [EMAIL
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, [windows-1255] =F0=E5=F8 =E3=E0=E5=E3 wrote:
David,
=20
But why fail the first time? Nonetheless, there's a clear ESMTP protocol =
=3D
to address exactly this problem. You save bandwidth, save resources on =
=3D
the SMTP server and G-d knows what else.
=20
My C++
13 matches
Mail list logo
