[xmail] Re: Addition to 1.2x

2004-12-26 Thread Mike Harrington
Hey at least I didn't ask for IMAP again ;) Thanks a million Davide. I promise no more requests for a while. -Mike - Original Message - From: "Davide Libenzi" To: "XMail mailing list" Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2004 3:48 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Addition to 1.2x > On Sun, 26 Dec 200

[xmail] Re: Addition to 1.2x

2004-12-26 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote: > Davide, > > I know people have asked for this before, but if it's not too much trouble, > do you think you could add in LastLoginTimeDate or something similar into > the userstat information. I know you can parse through the POP3 log files > for this

[xmail] Re: Addition to 1.2x

2004-12-26 Thread Shawn Anderson
I would love to see this as well :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Harrington Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2004 5:52 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Addition to 1.2x Davide, I know people have asked for this before, bu

[xmail] Re: 1.21-pre02 ...

2004-12-26 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Liron Newman wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > >- Changed the logic used to treat domain and user MAILPROC.TAB files. > > Before, a user's MAILPROC.TAB was overriding the domain one, while now > > the rules are merged together, with domain's ones first, followed by > >

[xmail] Addition to 1.2x

2004-12-26 Thread Mike Harrington
Davide, I know people have asked for this before, but if it's not too much trouble, do you think you could add in LastLoginTimeDate or something similar into the userstat information. I know you can parse through the POP3 log files for this, but it's not really ideal for a lot of scenarios especi

[xmail] Re: 1.21-pre02 ...

2004-12-26 Thread Liron Newman
Davide Libenzi wrote: >- Changed the logic used to treat domain and user MAILPROC.TAB files. > Before, a user's MAILPROC.TAB was overriding the domain one, while now > the rules are merged together, with domain's ones first, followed by > user's ones. > > Does this include cmdaliases? -

[xmail] Re: 1.21-pre02 ...

2004-12-26 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote: > Two questions on 1.21: > > 1) I'm assuming external aliases are on a 1 to 1 basis (one external alias > per mailbox). Is this correct? If not, how would having multiple external > aliases for a single mailbox work? Yes, but I noticed that currently

[xmail] Re: 1.21-pre02 ...

2004-12-26 Thread Mike Harrington
Two questions on 1.21: 1) I'm assuming external aliases are on a 1 to 1 basis (one external alias per mailbox). Is this correct? If not, how would having multiple external aliases for a single mailbox work? 2) Do you have to flush the spool in 1.20 before upgrading to 1.21 because the format ch

[xmail] 1.21-pre02 ...

2004-12-26 Thread Davide Libenzi
I made 1.21-pre02 with Windows binaries also: http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre02.tar.gz http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre02.win32bin.zip Here's the change-log: - Added external aliases support in the CTRL protocol. - The MESSAGE.ID file is now automatically created, if missin

[xmail] Re: 1.21-pre01 ...

2004-12-26 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote: > No, in < 1.20 you could simply remove the MaxMBSize variable to get an > "unlimited" mailbox size (As far as I understood it). I was wondering if > this still held true in 1.21, or if you had to specifically set it to "0" > now. Both works with the s

[xmail] Re: 1.21-pre01 ...

2004-12-26 Thread Mike Harrington
No, in < 1.20 you could simply remove the MaxMBSize variable to get an "unlimited" mailbox size (As far as I understood it). I was wondering if this still held true in 1.21, or if you had to specifically set it to "0" now. - Original Message - From: "Davide Libenzi" To: Sent: Saturday,