My XMail cannot send hotmail.com mail.
(BWhen XMail sends the RSET command, hotmail.com returns 554.
(B
(BIn XMail, is there a method of not using the RSET command?
(B
(B220 mc5-f2.hotmail.com Sending unsolicited commercial or bulk e-mail to
(BMicrosoft's computer network is prohibited.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, February 22, 2005
(B10:10 AM:
(B
(B My XMail cannot send hotmail.com mail.
(B When XMail sends the RSET command, hotmail.com returns 554.
(B
(B In XMail, is there a method of not using the RSET command?
(B
(BDo you mail directly from a dialup IP? If so
Thank you.
(BIt is in the same range as other dynamic Internet Protocol addresses though
(Bmy
(BInternet Protocol address is fixation.
(B
(BIt is a fixed with provider contract.
(BHowever, it is only one IPaddress not to be able to
(Bpull withershins.
(B
(BHowever, it succeeds in the
I noticed mysteriously.
(BWhen the example of the success in the transmission is seen, [MAIL FROM] and
(B[RCPT TO] are repeated.
(BIs this something influence?
(B
(B
(B220 EZweb Mail
(BEHLO aaa.net
(B250-lsean.ezweb.ne.jp
(B250-PIPELINING
(B250-SIZE 3145728
(B250-ETRN
(B250 8BITMIME
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, takebeat wrote:
I noticed mysteriously.
When the example of the success in the transmission is seen, [MAIL FROM] and
[RCPT TO] are repeated.
Is this something influence?
220 EZweb Mail
EHLO aaa.net
250-lsean.ezweb.ne.jp
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 3145728
250-ETRN
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
Hi Davide,
=20
I noticed that if all SMTP threads are busy, XMail throws the message
421 Server too busy
=20
That is good, but imho it does not get logged anywhere, does it?
That's XMail's way of logging. It logs to remote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, February 22, 2005 4:49
PM:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=3DF6nke Ruempler wrote:
=20
Hi Davide,
=3D20
I noticed that if all SMTP threads are busy, XMail throws the
message 421 Server too busy =3D20
That is good, but imho it does not get logged
Hi Davide,
is there a chance to implement a pop3link handler, which deletes messages
from the server right after each other?
Background: If a pop3links connection gets interrupted, it retrieves all
messages again from the very beginning. This can cause a lot of duplicates,
when you have a bad
Hello!
Harald Schneider wrote at 22 Feb 2005 17:03:
is there a chance to implement a pop3link handler, which deletes
messages from the server right after each other? Background: If a
Good Idea!
I was just experiencing dupes today due to a fallback from UMTS to
GPRS while downloading pop3
Indeed .. a customer of mine had some DSL line problems last week, which
caused about 150 duplicates in his local POP box. They all were =
generated by
failing pop3link attempts :-/
--Harald
-Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Hi,
Anyone got a copy of bsa_filter.pl? The website which hosted it seems to
be down and the posts by the creator on this list were made from an
address that no longer works. If anyone has a copy I'd be most
appreciative if you could email it to me:
jonathang(at)gloriajeanscoffees.com.au
No, it is a result of monitoring the packet of the SMTP session of XMail.
A detailed packet monitor result is put this time.
--
220 asahi-net.or.jp ESMTP SpamBlock.ps 3.4.81; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:29:09
+0900
EHLO akitacity.net
250-sbmx5 Hello [IP PROTECTED], pleased to meet you
250-8bitmime
Hi Davide,
it seems that XMail quits with a Bad SMTP response when the remote server
sends a 220 response after a HELO.
Here an example:
Instead of
Connected to mail.uniovi.es.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 ALEPH.NET.UNIOVI.ES -- Server ESMTP (PMDF V6.2-X17#30969)
helo test
250
13 matches
Mail list logo
