[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Harald Schneider
Everything works fine now, it was a config issue in /etc/mailer.conf. Nothing XMail related. 1.23 still does its job and all things are up and running! THanks! --Harald Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: > >> I also added DEFAULT_DOMAIN to the sendmail script

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: > > I also added DEFAULT_DOMAIN to the sendmail script - same effect! > Would be nice, if some other OpenBSD users could test this ... Try to add a: printf("DEFAULT_DOMAIN = '%s'\n", getenv(DEFAULT_DOMAIN)); at the beginning of SendMail.cpp and rebu

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Harald Schneider
I also added DEFAULT_DOMAIN to the sendmail script - same effect! Would be nice, if some other OpenBSD users could test this ... --Harald Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: > >> It's exported in XMail's startup script. However adding it to >> sendmail.xmail.sh

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Jeff Buehler wrote: > Here is another verification that it builds fine on FreeBSD 5.4. I > haven't tried running it yet. No one with NetBSD/Solaris? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Jeff Buehler
Here is another verification that it builds fine on FreeBSD 5.4. I haven't tried running it yet. Jeff Davide Libenzi wrote: >I might have found the reason for the XMail erratic behaviour on some BSDs >versions. I need Solaris and *BSD users to try to build and run the >following version: >

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: > It's exported in XMail's startup script. However adding it to > sendmail.xmail.sh does make no difference ... Well, check again. The XMail startup script does not matter here, since it is not XMail that does fill it up. It is XMail's sendmail. -

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Harald Schneider
It's exported in XMail's startup script. However adding it to sendmail.xmail.sh does make no difference ... --Harald Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: > >> Has anyone tested if system mails arrive on OpenBSD 3.7 ? >> >> If I do >> #mail root >> Subject: test

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: > Has anyone tested if system mails arrive on OpenBSD 3.7 ? > > If I do > #mail root > Subject: test > test > .. > > ... then the message stays in resending state without any SLOG created: > > [127.0.0.1]:0;[127.0.0.1]:0;Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:35:17 +0200

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Harald Schneider
Has anyone tested if system mails arrive on OpenBSD 3.7 ? If I do #mail root Subject: test test .. ... then the message stays in resending state without any SLOG created: [127.0.0.1]:0;[127.0.0.1]:0;Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:35:17 +0200 local.net L34FB mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rcpt to: <> Receiv

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Sasa Stupar
--On 12. oktober 2005 16:13 -0700 Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > I might have found the reason for the XMail erratic behaviour on some > BSDs versions. I need Solaris and *BSD users to try to build and run the > following version: > > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.23-pre01.tar.gz > > Thank yo

[xmail] Re: Build/Smoke test request ...

2005-10-13 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote: > You're the best! > It works perfeclty now. Even the stuck mails from the previous build are > delivered instantly. > > Can you tell which problem caused this behavious? Something thread related ? The gethostby{name,addr}_r are not available, so XMai