Hi
I'm using xmail on a Linux Ubuntu in a vmware machine on Windows XP.
That's just for trying out but should still work fine. It usually works well
but sometimes a POP3 or SMTP connection from the mail client is not
closed immediately. I can see it in the debug output that POP3 client
connection
has anyone else had a problem with Xmail resending old emails (months
old) after a system reboot??
Thanks,
chad
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the sender indicating
the eMail was
NOT delivered because of a bad eMail
Hey there Chad,
I see this a lot.
I also have a problem that sometimes I get spam that appears to have
bypassed spamassassin. I can't figure this out.
--
Charlie Qualls
Property Director/IT Manager
Girl Scouts - Fox Valley Council
Wednesday, October 3, 2007, 9:08:09 AM, you wrote:
has
Hi,
Last weekend I had an example of this happen to one of my backup mail servers.
When I noticed the problem there were 27,000 NDR type messages it was
trying to deliver.
Mostly all were sent to random [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail server
was diligently trying sending NDR's to every single
Wolfy Wrote @ Wednesday, October 03, 2007 10:37 AM
Last weekend I had an example of this happen to one of my backup mail
servers.
When I noticed the problem there were 27,000 NDR type messages it was
trying to deliver.
Mostly all were sent to random [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail server was
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Chad Fleenor wrote:
has anyone else had a problem with Xmail resending old emails (months
old) after a system reboot??
You call a filter. Filter timeouts. XMail tries to remove the spool file,
and fails. File remains inside the spool (but not in the in-memory queue).
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
Hi Davide,
I'm just trying to move an xmail setup to a win 2003 64bit server, and have
got 99% of the way.
However I find that I'm getting Blacklist (EIPMAP) errors in the smtp log,
but nothing else.
Investigations from another xmail server
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the sender indicating
the eMail was
Francis Wrote @ Wednesday, October 03, 2007 10:37 AM
Use glst (greylisting) :)
Allmost 99% of these bad connexions will be elliminated, as 99% will =
never retry.
And as glst will first response with a 4xx code, no NDR until second =
attempt connexion accepted by glst.
That is a good
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the sender indicating
the eMail was
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
Hi
I'm using xmail on a Linux Ubuntu in a vmware machine on Windows XP.
That's just for trying out but should still work fine. It usually works well
but sometimes a POP3 or SMTP connection from the mail client is not
closed immediately. I can see
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a
dictionary for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
etc. Then the eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the
sender indicating the eMail was NOT
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a
dictionary for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
etc. Then the eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the
On 4 Oct 2007, at 0:36, K. Wolf wrote:
Hi,
Last weekend I had an example of this happen to one of my backup mail servers.
When I noticed the problem there were 27,000 NDR type messages it was
trying to deliver.
Mostly all were sent to random [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail server
was
Any way to get Xmail to use authentication when relaying mail with
smtprelay in mailproc.tab?
--John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
I'm sorry, I should have said that we are running xMail V1.24 at
present -- so I guess I'm saying that our xMail Server V1.24 does NOT
reject the bad destination eMails in the MTA session -- they seem to
get queued for later retry delivery attempts
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, John Kielkopf wrote:
Any way to get Xmail to use authentication when relaying mail with
smtprelay in mailproc.tab?
Check this out:
http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#smtp_client_authentication
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
I'm sorry, I should have said that we are running xMail V1.24 at
present -- so I guess I'm saying that our xMail Server V1.24 does NOT
reject the bad destination eMails in the MTA session -- they seem to
get
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 3:54 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Bounced eMail messags
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
As my spool gets inundated with junk, I run this command every day at
11:30 p.m. via a cron job.
find /var/MailRoot/spool -depth -name *.MX2 -ctime 1 -delete
MX2 is the name of one of my xmail boxes so all files in the spool have
it appended to the end of the filename by default.
Works like a
I have a stock V1.24 out of the box -- only filter installed is xbmf.c.
Never heard about xbmf !?!?
No link in xmailserver.org home page in available tools :/
I missed somethink usefull ?
Davide, what is the purpose of this filter ?
Thanks
Francis
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Dale Qualls wrote:
As my spool gets inundated with junk, I run this command every day at
11:30 p.m. via a cron job.
find /var/MailRoot/spool -depth -name *.MX2 -ctime 1 -delete
MX2 is the name of one of my xmail boxes so all files in the spool have
it appended to the
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
I have a stock V1.24 out of the box -- only filter installed is xbmf.c.
Never heard about xbmf !?!?
No link in xmailserver.org home page in available tools :/
I missed somethink usefull ?
Davide, what is the purpose of this filter ?
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
HI Davide,
Xmail 1.24
And no I did not build 64-bit binaries - I don't have compiler, and I
thought it should run in the 32-bit emulation - just like many other
programs.
Do you or anyone else have 64-bit binaries?
What does the (-20) error
HI Davide,
Xmail 1.24
And no I did not build 64-bit binaries - I don't have compiler, and I
thought it should run in the 32-bit emulation - just like many other
programs.
Do you or anyone else have 64-bit binaries?
What does the (-20) error indicate? It seems it is likely to do with
creating
I have a stock V1.24 out of the box -- only filter installed is xbmf.c.
Never heard about xbmf !?!?
No link in xmailserver.org home page in available tools :/
I missed somethink usefull ?
xbmf was developed to deal with the eMail tail null-byte issue and another
liken brethren.
The
My xmail servers are only pass through boxes for redundancy and virus
scanning (and yes, my retry is 1 day so having a 2 day purge is perfect
in my scenario).
The only things that ever stay in my spool are ndr's back to spammers.
Thanks!
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Dale Qualls
30 matches
Mail list logo
