Davice,
How about (read-only) rsync? I think rsync is even better than HTTP HEAD.
I can host (another) mirror in The Netherlands, but only if you need one.
Ivo
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Davide Libenzi xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Monday, January 07,
Or, instead of adding a system dependent feature to XMail, someone can
write something trivially simple that moves messages from one folder
to
the other (XMail's one), with proper conversion.
That's not system dependent, anyone can use it and I think that in most
cases it will be easier to
Hello,
After upgrading from 1.24, xspamc 0.4.4 (unix) with spamd 3.1.0 on Bluewhite
64 simply refuses to work. As command line is not supported in xspamc, no
debug is available. No message reaches spamd, no entry in XMail or xspamc
logs, the emails just pass through without being examined.
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Ivo Smits wrote:
Davice,
How about (read-only) rsync? I think rsync is even better than HTTP HEAD.
The site is not big, so I don't need that extra optimization. Plus, I
consume only about 40GB of the monthly 200GB I have ;)
I can host (another) mirror in The
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote:
Bonjour Davide,
R=E9ponse au message re=E7u le 07/01/2008 =E0 00:03 :
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote:
Bonjour Davide,
=20
Maybe Mihai will sort this out. All other mirrors but Italy,
Netherland and Eye-Catcher are showing 1.25.
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote:
Hello,
After upgrading from 1.24, xspamc 0.4.4 (unix) with spamd 3.1.0 on Bluewhite
64 simply refuses to work. As command line is not supported in xspamc, no
debug is available. No message reaches spamd, no entry in XMail or xspamc
logs, the emails
On Monday 07 January 2008 20:05, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote:
Hello,
After upgrading from 1.24, xspamc 0.4.4 (unix) with spamd 3.1.0 on
Bluewhite 64 simply refuses to work. As command line is not supported in
xspamc, no debug is available. No message
