smtprelay.tab:
10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
195.60.190.0 255.255.255.0
195.60.191.0 255.255.255.0
213.178.209.0 255.255.255.0
147.123.125.0 255.255.255.0
195.60.88.128 255.255.255.128
213.136.179.21255.255.255.255
213.136.179.20255.255.255.255
89.189.54.0 255.255.255.0
89.189.53.0
Hey Rosario !!
Simply add this line at start of your smtprelay.tab file :
127.0.0.1[TAB]255.255.255.255
Doing so, you explicitly ask xmail to relay the local address :)
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Rosario Pingaro
Envoy=E9 :
I could be completly wrong :)
After reviewing the previous posts, it seems strange that the xmail =
server
rejecting with 'relay denied' and that is supposed to receive the mail =
from
another 'physical' server is login this line with 127.0.0.1 as the =
sender
!?!?
The original message was
no, i don't have any trasparent proxy,
very starnge that on 1.24 it works.
I will tests adding loopback address.
Regards
Rosario
- Original Message -
From: CLEMENT Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:27 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Fw:
adding the relay of the loopback address doesn't help.
this is the smtp log from xmail:
smtp.convergenze.it smtp.convergenze.it 213.136.179.20
2008-02-20 14:17:17 ip-179-20.sn3.eutelia.it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S28D32D RCPT=ERELAY 0
Regards
no it is the only log line about the problem.
CustMapsList variable is commented in my server.tab configuration file.
Rosario
- Original Message -
From: CLEMENT Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:33 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Fw: 550
If I resume we have :
An smtp client at ip 213.136.179.20
The smtp server xmail have :
- smtprelay.tab that refer explicitly to the client adresse
- no CustMapList setting
- no filtering system or transparent proxy in front of the xmail =
server
Any filter installed on xmail itself ? (all
no filter installed in filters.*.tab!
spammers.tab is empity.
smtp.ipmap.tab is: 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ALLOW 1
Thge problem is in my opinion in the 503 Bad sequence of commands that
sendmail logs.
Maybe Davide can help.
Regards
Rosario
- Original Message -
From: CLEMENT
A simple question :) :
When trying to sending a mail from the sendmail server to a account on =
the
xmail server does xmail accept de mail ?
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Rosario Pingaro
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 20 f=E9vrier 2008
OK, just to add to my confusion, here is part of what is going on - this
server also provides the authoritative DNS for trikorausa.com (but not
local DNS queries or caching!). It does not provide any other services
for trikorausa.com (no email etc.) - the records point to an outside
address.
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Hello Davide
Recently I asked you how SMARTDnshost variable affected xmail internal
resolver, and you said that when using SmartDnsHost, xmail only ask for =
the
'final' request (directly the mx lookup without trying first soa, ns, =
)
I
yes it does.
Rosario
- Original Message -
From: CLEMENT Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 12:34 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25
A simple question :) :
When trying to sending a mail from the
yes there is TAB in fact 1.24 works fine.
Regards
Rosario
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 2:09 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rosario
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote:
smtprelay.tab:
10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
195.60.190.0 255.255.255.0
195.60.191.0 255.255.255.0
213.178.209.0 255.255.255.0
147.123.125.0 255.255.255.0
195.60.88.128 255.255.255.128
213.136.179.21255.255.255.255
213.136.179.20
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote:
yes there is TAB in fact 1.24 works fine.
The fact that it works fine in 1.24 does not mean that there's a TAB. IP
parsing code changed in 1.25, and it there was a TAB in 1.24, that'd have
been parsed fine anyway. XMail would have been fetched the
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote:
yes there is TAB in fact 1.24 works fine.
The fact that it works fine in 1.24 does not mean that there's a TAB. IP
parsing code changed in 1.25, and it there was a TAB in 1.24, that'd have
... and
Hi Davide -
Yes, it works from an external line, but not from the server itself. I
am trying to figure out why providing the authoritative DNS for that
domain (pointing to another server on the net which provides everything
else for the domain) causes the failure - it seems to be looping,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Jeff Buehler wrote:
OK, just to add to my confusion, here is part of what is going on - this
server also provides the authoritative DNS for trikorausa.com (but not
local DNS queries or caching!). It does not provide any other services
for trikorausa.com (no email
213.136.179.20255.255.255.255
hoohoho it was not!?!??!!?
how stupid am I???
regards
Rosario
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 2:09 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Fw:
19 matches
Mail list logo
