[xmail] Re: AV and SA

2004-12-29 Thread CLEMENT Francis
Objet : [xmail] Re: AV and SA It is a question I think for some time. Do you do AV first, then SA, or SA first and then AV?? Tony On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:21:14 -0600, Jason J. Ellingson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *** JUST AN OPINION - PLEASE TAKE WITH A GRAIN OF SALT *** =20 - To unsubscribe

[xmail] Re: AV and SA

2004-12-29 Thread Shiloh Jennings
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = On Behalf Of Tony Wu Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 8:31 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: AV and SA It is a question I think for some time. Do you do AV first, then SA, or SA first and then AV?? Tony On Tue, 28 Dec

[xmail] Re: AV and SA

2004-12-29 Thread Shiloh Jennings
, December 28, 2004 5:21 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: AV and SA *** JUST AN OPINION - PLEASE TAKE WITH A GRAIN OF SALT *** I think it is a great idea. However, here is why I choose not to do it = that way: 1) Only scans those messages under 250KB or whatever limit you set

[xmail] Re: AV and SA

2004-12-29 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
, December 29, 2004 12:00 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: AV and SA 1) Most of the popular viruses are not very big. My main virus concern = is the fast spreading email worms. This solution is blocking those nicely. There is always a potential with any solution that something might

[xmail] Re: AV and SA

2004-12-29 Thread Shiloh Jennings
:22 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: AV and SA I'm glad to see that we are in agreement on these topics. Another idea could be to separate your inbound email servers from the = pop3 server. Then you could have several inbound servers (via multiple MX records at same weight

[xmail] Re: AV and SA

2004-12-29 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
615.301.1682 : nashville 612.605.1132 : minneapolis www.ellingson.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shiloh Jennings Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 2:27 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: AV and SA Have

[xmail] Re: AV and SA

2004-12-28 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
*** JUST AN OPINION - PLEASE TAKE WITH A GRAIN OF SALT *** I think it is a great idea. However, here is why I choose not to do it that way: 1) Only scans those messages under 250KB or whatever limit you set on SPAMC. This misses any potentially infected files a friend might send you in a larger

[xmail] Re: AV and SA

2004-12-28 Thread Tony Wu
It is a question I think for some time. Do you do AV first, then SA, or SA first and then AV?? Tony On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:21:14 -0600, Jason J. Ellingson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *** JUST AN OPINION - PLEASE TAKE WITH A GRAIN OF SALT *** I think it is a great idea. However, here is why I