EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Shawn Anderson wrote:
> Question, what is the period of time?
I don't remember. It's about the right time though :-)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
Question, what is the period of time?
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...
On Mon, 19 Jan
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Veeresh Khanorkar wrote:
>
>
>
>>P.S: BTW I had subscribed on this a long time ago, however couple of
>>days back when I tried to send mail, ecartis 'backed off' me. Any proble
>>with ecartis?
>>
>>
>
>I setup ecartis to automatically unsubscribe
I am not arguing that :) I was just curious -- it is not hard to
resubscribe :)
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 4:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Shawn Anderson wrote:
> I am just curious because I had a 24 hour dns outage, and found my self
> unsubscribed -- isn't that a little on the short side?
IIRC it goes with the number of bounces per period. And this means that
you can stay off-line for five days w/out being un
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Shawn Anderson wrote:
> Question, what is the period of time?
I don't remember. It's about the right time though :-)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Shawn Anderson wrote:
> Question, what is the period of time?
I don't remember. It's about the right time though :-)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line
Question, what is the period of time?
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...
On Mon, 19 Jan
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Veeresh Khanorkar wrote:
> P.S: BTW I had subscribed on this a long time ago, however couple of
> days back when I tried to send mail, ecartis 'backed off' me. Any proble
> with ecartis?
I setup ecartis to automatically unsubscribe addresses that achieve a
given number of bo
Dear Veeresh,
lundi 19 janvier 2004 at 07:43:49, you said :
Veeresh> Any link, pointer where I can understand what's happening with XMail if
Veeresh> its on Red Hat 9?
Vendredi 26 décembre 2003 at 10:11:51, Pascal said :
Pascal> First, Merry Christmas everybody :-)
Pascal> I have xmail 1.1
Any link, pointer where I can understand what's happening with XMail if
its on Red Hat 9?
Regards,
Veeresh
P.S: BTW I had subscribed on this a long time ago, however couple of
days back when I tried to send mail, ecartis 'backed off' me. Any proble
with ecartis?
-=-=-
I am the "ILOVEGNU" sig
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Veeresh Khanorkar wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
> I am definitely using it on Red Hat 9 though. Any problems, updates with
> that?
Yes. Put:
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1
inside your /etc/rc.d/init.d/xmail
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" i
Hi Davide,
I am definitely using it on Red Hat 9 though. Any problems, updates with
that?
Regards,
Veeresh
-=-=-
Microsoft should switch to the vacuum cleaner business where people
actually want products that suck.
-=-=-
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
>
>
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
> Thank you Davide and Everybody :-)
>
> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 in the starting srcript solves for good :-)
>
> XMail seems running perfectly!!!
>
> Davide, may be you have to add on the install documention a special
> recommendation for RH9 users abou
Thank you Davide and Everybody :-)
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 in the starting srcript solves for good :-)
XMail seems running perfectly!!!
Davide, may be you have to add on the install documention a special
recommendation for RH9 users about Checking or Adding LD_ASSUME_KERNEL
?
Really thank you f
Dear Davide,
Just to information you about XMAIL :
Running without -static but with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL in the starting
script.
Running from Jan 12 :
- no crash
- Using never over 85 Mb
Seems very good :-)
mardi 13 janvier 2004 at 08:30:34, you said :
Davide>
mardi 13 janvier 2004 at 08:30:34, you said :
Davide> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
>> XMail has running all night without crash
Davide> I lost the track. So, now you have RH9 + -static + LD_ASSUME_KERNEL, don't
Davide> you?
No I have :
Compil on RH9 without -static but with L
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
> XMail has running all night without crash
I lost the track. So, now you have RH9 + -static + LD_ASSUME_KERNEL, don't
you?
> Davide; do you the coredump file of previous crash or can i
> destroy it ?
You can nuke it.
- Davide
-
To unsubscrib
XMail has running all night without crash
Davide; do you the coredump file of previous crash or can i
destroy it ?
Thank for your help
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 19:03:30, you said :
Davide> Starting from when they introduced NPTL,
Davide> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL is permanently
Davide> in my /et
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 19:03:30, you said :
Davide> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
>> So, I generated a new version without -static
>> And I have LD_ASSUME_KERNEL in my starting script
>>
>> I have to say XMail is using only 60 Mo exactly the same
>> quantity of the version with
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
>
> lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 17:54:20, you said :
>
> Bill> I think for the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to make a difference you have to use
> Bill> the version compiled on RH9 with no special options like the -static.
> Bill> Just a guess though.
>
> So, I genera
Pascal de R. wrote:
>lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 18:21:26, you said :
>
>Jeffrey> Pascal de R. wrote:
>
>
>
>>>Dear Jeffrey,
>>>
>>>
>>>lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 16:53:00, you said :
>>>
>>>
>>>Jeffrey> Have you tried using the kernel from the RPM?
>>>
>>>I'm not sure to understand your suggest ?
>>
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 18:21:26, you said :
Jeffrey> Pascal de R. wrote:
>>Dear Jeffrey,
>>
>>
>>lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 16:53:00, you said :
>>
>>
>>Jeffrey> Have you tried using the kernel from the RPM?
>>
>>I'm not sure to understand your suggest ?
>>
>>
>>
Jeffrey> Poor choice of words,
his new information ?
Bill> Bill
>>--
>>From: Pascal de R.[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 6:34 AM
>>To: Harald Schneider
>>Subject: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...
>>
&g
Pascal de R. wrote:
>Dear Jeffrey,
>
>
>lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 16:53:00, you said :
>
>
>Jeffrey> Have you tried using the kernel from the RPM?
>
>I'm not sure to understand your suggest ?
>
>
>
Poor choice of words, I should have said binary not kernel. You can
install XMail RPM file which
L PROTECTED]
>>>Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 6:34 AM
>>>To: Harald Schneider
>>>Subject: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...
>>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunatly, xmail crashed at 3pm :-((
>>>
>>>
>
Dear Jeffrey,
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 16:53:00, you said :
Jeffrey> Have you tried using the kernel from the RPM?
I'm not sure to understand your suggest ?
Jeffrey> Jeff
Jeffrey> -
Jeffrey> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
Jeffrey> the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 6:34 AM
>>To: Harald Schneider
>>Subject: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...
>>
>>
>> Unfortunatly, xmail crashed at 3pm :-((
>>
>>
>> Any other idea ?
>>
&
ld Schneider
>Subject: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...
>
>
> Unfortunatly, xmail crashed at 3pm :-((
>
>
> Any other idea ?
>
>
>lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 09:31:11, you said :
>
>Harald> Exactly 2.4.1 .. this makes the system to emul
Pascal de R. wrote:
> Unfortunatly, xmail crashed at 3pm :-((
>
>
> Any other idea ?
>
>
>
Have you tried using the kernel from the RPM?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "hel
Unfortunatly, xmail crashed at 3pm :-((
Any other idea ?
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 09:31:11, you said :
Harald> Exactly 2.4.1 .. this makes the system to emulate the older threading =
Harald> scheme.
Harald> RedHat9 comes with a new thread-handler, which is not always that =
Harald> compat
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 09:31:11, you said :
Harald> Exactly 2.4.1 .. this makes the system to emulate the older threading =
Harald> scheme.
thank you, it's running from now...let's see!
Best regards,
Pascal, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xm
32 matches
Mail list logo
