[xmail] Re: Coredumps on NetBSD-3.0 - XMail memory settings

2006-06-13 Thread David Lord
On 12 Jun 2006, at 17:21, Davide Libenzi wrote: On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, David Lord wrote: This now looks as though I've been picking up NetBSD 2 packages rather than NetBSD 3. I noticed a while back that new install of lsof from a package was complaining it was 2.0 so checked on gmake

[xmail] Re: Coredumps on NetBSD-3.0 - XMail memory settings

2006-06-12 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, David Lord wrote: This now looks as though I've been picking up NetBSD 2 packages rather than NetBSD 3. I noticed a while back that new install of lsof from a package was complaining it was 2.0 so checked on gmake binary which hadn't changed from before I thought I'd

[xmail] Re: Coredumps on NetBSD-3.0 - XMail memory settings

2006-06-08 Thread David Lord
On 3 Jun 2006, at 9:35, David Lord wrote: snipped This now looks as though I've been picking up NetBSD 2 packages rather than NetBSD 3. I noticed a while back that new install of lsof from a package was complaining it was 2.0 so checked on gmake binary which hadn't changed from before I

[xmail] Re: Coredumps on NetBSD-3.0 - XMail memory settings

2006-06-03 Thread David Lord
On 1 Jun 2006, at 17:49, Davide Libenzi wrote: On Wed, 31 May 2006, David Lord wrote: I'm not sure of exact cause but I'm getting fairly regular coredumps from XMail on NetBSD-3.0. Whist the fd-open files issue on my FreeBSD setup isn't apparent it is still an annoyance and if

[xmail] Re: Coredumps on NetBSD-3.0 - XMail memory settings

2006-06-01 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 31 May 2006, David Lord wrote: I'm not sure of exact cause but I'm getting fairly regular coredumps from XMail on NetBSD-3.0. Whist the fd-open files issue on my FreeBSD setup isn't apparent it is still an annoyance and if anything was a little more frequent, 2 - 3 days vs 2 - 3