On 06.03.2006 14:56, Dale Qualls wrote:
All I could find on the 'net had to do with possible timeout erros
(apparently this is what the -97 means).
spamd is running but it almost seems like SA isn't answering when it's
called by the filter.
Any thoughts off the top of your heads?
Maybe
Hiya!
Nope, I used that but didn't see diddly. I am going to look at the
var/log/mail log when I can though, that should show me if the
spamassassin daemon is responding, I didn't think to do that at the
time.
I'm thinking that the -97 may be a timeout but I'm not positive. I
already have QT
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Dale Qualls wrote:
Well, we attempted to replace our mailserver this weekend but had to
revert back to the older one due to a filter issue that didn't make
much sense to me.
Original setup:
RH8
XMail 1.22
f-prot (using a modified clamav filter)
SA 3.0.2 (using
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Tuesday, March 07, 2006 4:53 PM:
The error -97 is ERR_FORK. It means you there are too many running
processes, or the system was unable to exec your filter.
-97 can also happen if the specified filter segfaults.
I know from my own experience. :D
--
Regards,
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Alexander Hagenah wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Tuesday, March 07, 2006 4:53 PM:
The error -97 is ERR_FORK. It means you there are too many running
processes, or the system was unable to exec your filter.
-97 can also happen if the specified filter segfaults.
I
Hiya!
Yes. Actually, I installed xmail then copied my backup over the top
of the fresh install so that all of my pathing and executables would
be in the exact same place (/var/MailRoot).
Dang.
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, March 7,
