On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
First think to signal is that XMail DO NOT ALLWAYS EXECUTE =
filters.in.tab ON
EVERY RECEIVED MAIL !! even if you say :
*[TAB]*[TAB]0.0.0.0/0[TAB]0.0.0.0/0[TAB]yourfilterfile.tab[NEW=
LINE
] (execute this for all)
Davide previously said (if I
Hello Davide,
OK. It's realy cool.
And if you send 1 message to the list, consisting of 50 people, then
how many messages are in a spool after that? :)
send ONE message to the mailinglist - all mailinglist subscribers
incoming mail is scanned AGAIN. And as they are local domain users,
that's
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Renar Dobkevich wrote:
I have a regular mailserver (1.17) with a multiple domains and a few
mailinglists (xmail ones) with SpamAssassin and Antivirus filter.
When a mail is sent to a list system load is just horrible as it
spawns spamd and checkvirus scripts for a count
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Try this :
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.17-pre04.tar.gz
and look at the syslog when it fails.
It is not there so we cannot download it.
--
Groeten,
Peter
--
WinErr: 018 Unrecoverable error - System has been destroyed. Buy a new
one. Old Windows licence
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Try this :
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.17-pre04.tar.gz
and look at the syslog when it fails.
It is not there so we cannot download it.
--
Groeten,
Peter
Try this :
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.17-pre05.tar.gz
I cannot get a
spankie wrote:
Try this :
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.17-pre05.tar.gz
I cannot get a failure with this version.
thanks,
Installed it now on my server. I'll keep looking in to the logs if I see
the error or not.
--
Groeten,
Peter
--
Sorry, we deleted that package last
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Peter Lindeman wrote:
spankie wrote:
Try this :
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.17-pre05.tar.gz
I cannot get a failure with this version.
thanks,
Installed it now on my server. I'll keep looking in to the logs if I see
the error or not.
It was not
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Installed it now on my server. I'll keep looking in to the logs if I see
the error or not.
It was not script responsibility. There was a bug in XMail (Unix) for
versions 1.17-pre05. Basically the external program was executed but
XMail failed to detect it. Versions
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, spankie wrote:
I ran XMail in debug mode and here is the error it throws:
POP3 client exit [24.106.36.93]
Filter error: Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(/var/MailRoot/spamassassin/sa_filter.pl)
SMAIL local SMTP = darad.com From = [EMAIL
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, spankie wrote:
I ran XMail in debug mode and here is the error it throws:
POP3 client exit [24.106.36.93]
Filter error: Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient =
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(/var/MailRoot/spamassassin/sa_filter.pl)
SMAIL local SMTP = darad.com From = [EMAIL
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, spankie wrote:
Did you try 1.17-pre03 ?
- Davide
Yes, that is what these results are from.
Try this :
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.17-pre04.tar.gz
and look at the syslog when it fails.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
spankie wrote:
I'll see the same thing on my system, I will try to look into it if it
is perhaps an AV filter problem, please let me know if you find anything.
i managed to get around this problem by calling one shell script with both
the AV script and Spam script inside of it. I had to
spankie wrote:
I'll see the same thing on my system, I will try to look into it if it
is perhaps an AV filter problem, please let me know if you find
anything.
i managed to get around this problem by calling one shell script with
both
the AV script and Spam script inside of it. I
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, spankie wrote:
i managed to get around this problem by calling one shell script with both
the AV script and Spam script inside of it. I had to put some exit code
checking in the script but it works consistently now. Davide, is it
possible there is a problem with the
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, spankie wrote:
i managed to get around this problem by calling one shell script with
both
the AV script and Spam script inside of it. I had to put some exit code
checking in the script but it works consistently now. Davide, is it
possible there is a problem with
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Peter Lindeman wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
No, otherwise the filter will fail in such case. Try to run XMail in debug
mode from a console.
Just start it in a console session with the normal paramaters on the
cmdline and redirecting the output to a log ? When it
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 10:23 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: filters.in.tab oddity
sounds like a timing issue, with the previous process not releasing the
file
before the next process starts.
Rob :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, spankie wrote:
i thought the same thing, so i stuck in a loop when it can't find the
file,
to pause a second and try again...it never leaves the loop, the messages
is
physically gone out of the spool directory at the point it gets to try
and
process it.
Are you
Isn't there a time limit for filters to finish operations? If the filter
takes too long, the message is processed by xmail and sent?
Could you be running into this limit?
i don't know, is there a time limit? However, there doesn't appear to be a
delay in processing. The log shows no more
Please be advised that the SpamAssassin script doesn't support the new
filter architecture as of 1.16. You need to modify the script to use the
new return values. I've been too busy to upgrade XMail as well as upgrade
the script, but it's on my list.
-Don
Both scripts use @@FILE as the
that
processes filters sequentially.
thanks,
randy
- Original Message -
From: Don Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 9:14 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: filters.in.tab oddity
Please be advised that the SpamAssassin script doesn't support the new
filter
spankie wrote:
Isn't there a time limit for filters to finish operations? If the filter
takes too long, the message is processed by xmail and sent?
Could you be running into this limit?
i don't know, is there a time limit? However, there doesn't appear to be a
delay in processing. The
I'll see the same thing on my system, I will try to look into it if it
is perhaps an AV filter problem, please let me know if you find
anything.
--
Groeten,
Peter
--
Thanks Peter. I'll let you know if i find anything, let me know if you
do.
thanks,
randy
I did find the
Isn't there a time limit for filters to finish operations? If the filter
takes too long, the message is processed by xmail and sent?
Could you be running into this limit?
i don't know, is there a time limit? However, there doesn't appear to
be a
delay in processing. The log shows
Did you try 1.17-pre01 ?
I am now using 1.16 and the filter does let my own domain emails go through
now (filters.in.tab) when using RETCODE 16 to stop processing, the oddball
item is that it still puts the email in the KEEP dir of XScanner so I then
have duplicate copies.
But it works, even
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, spankie wrote:
I am running into a strange problem. I am filtering incoming e-mails
with
two filters, an antivirus script first, and then a spam detecting
script.
Occasionally, when the antivirus script runs and returns a 7 after
finding
no viruses and adding a
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, spankie wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, spankie wrote:
I am running into a strange problem. I am filtering incoming e-mails
with
two filters, an antivirus script first, and then a spam detecting
script.
Occasionally, when the antivirus script runs and returns a
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, spankie wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, spankie wrote:
I am running into a strange problem. I am filtering incoming
e-mails
with
two filters, an antivirus script first, and then a spam detecting
script.
Occasionally, when the antivirus script runs and
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, spankie wrote:
It is safe to say the scripts for a single message are executed
consecutively and not in parallel, correct?
Yes, they are. At least if you don't fork another task.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, spankie wrote:
It is safe to say the scripts for a single message are executed
consecutively and not in parallel, correct?
Yes, they are. At least if you don't fork another task.
- Davide
-
Nope, just running the perl scripts, no mods.
Odd, i will
sounds like a timing issue, with the previous process not releasing the file
before the next process starts.
Rob :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of spankie
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Filters.in.tab
sender[TAB]recipient[TAB]remote-addr[TAB]local-addr[TAB]f
ilename[N
EWLINE]
Your example would be:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 exception.tab
Duh, I should have read the documentation...
I wonder though if I have currently
The filters are executed in sequence in the order they are in the
filters.*.tab
In Filters.in.tab I tried your idea complete with batch file, I even tried
retcode 108 instead of 8, no go.
Then I tried sending it to my current filter, XScanner as such in
exception.tab
c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, William wrote:
The filters are executed in sequence in the order they are in the
filters.*.tab
In Filters.in.tab I tried your idea complete with batch file, I even tried
retcode 108 instead of 8, no go.
Then I tried sending it to my current filter, XScanner as such
Did you try 1.17-pre01 ?
Nope, I can read up on the changelog and see though.
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Searching the README, I found the following.
filters.in.tab
sender[TAB]recipient[TAB]remote-addr[TAB]local-addr[TAB]filename[N
EWLINE]
Your example would be:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 exception.tab
exception.tab
command[TAB]arg-or-macro[TAB]...[NEWLINE]
Your
36 matches
Mail list logo
