[xmail] Re: GLST.EXE taking 100% CPU

2006-04-25 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Michal A. Valasek wrote: | Likely the machine shut down incorrectly (aka bad crash). At least one of those three machines was NEVER shut down incorrectly. = It's important production server, which has its own UPS in addition of = another UPS and generator which backs

[xmail] Re: GLST.EXE taking 100% CPU

2006-04-21 Thread CLEMENT Francis
--- With this method (once per day) I resolved glst blocked processes definitively ... Francis -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Michal A. Valasek Envoyé : vendredi 21 avril 2006 07:53 A : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] Re: GLST.EXE

[xmail] Re: GLST.EXE taking 100% CPU

2006-04-21 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Michal A. Valasek wrote: | Can you try to do a dbdump+dbload to a new DB file? My guess is that=20 | something happened to the DB file and the simple GDBM is not able to=20 | detect and gracefully recover from it. Your guess was right. Although the database on each

[xmail] Re: GLST.EXE taking 100% CPU

2006-04-21 Thread Michal A. Valasek
| Likely the machine shut down incorrectly (aka bad crash). At least one of those three machines was NEVER shut down incorrectly. It's important production server, which has its own UPS in addition of another UPS and generator which backs up the entire server house. -- Altair - To unsubscribe

[xmail] Re: GLST.EXE taking 100% CPU

2006-04-20 Thread Michal A. Valasek
Newest version does not work as well. There is only one difference: with the old version I had there one or two stuck processes. Now I have here 150 of them. -- Michal A. Valasek - Altair Communications | Microsoft ASP.NET MVP PGP 0xC4F3579D | www.altaircom.net | www.rider.cz | www.aspnet.cz

[xmail] Re: GLST.EXE taking 100% CPU

2006-04-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Michal A. Valasek wrote: Newest version does not work as well. There is only one difference: with = the old version I had there one or two stuck processes. Now I have here = 150 of them. Can you try to do a dbdump+dbload to a new DB file? My guess is that something

[xmail] Re: GLST.EXE taking 100% CPU

2006-04-20 Thread Michal A. Valasek
| Can you try to do a dbdump+dbload to a new DB file? My guess is that | something happened to the DB file and the simple GDBM is not able to | detect and gracefully recover from it. Your guess was right. Although the database on each server has about 100 MB, resulting export has always only

[xmail] Re: GLST.EXE taking 100% CPU

2006-04-17 Thread Michal A. Valasek
| Are you using the latest version? I thought this problem was | solved with 0.23. I suppose so, but don't know. How I can verify what version do I have? -- Altair - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help:

[xmail] Re: GLST.EXE taking 100% CPU

2006-04-17 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Michal A. Valasek wrote: | Are you using the latest version? I thought this problem was=20 | solved with 0.23. I suppose so, but don't know. How I can verify what version do I have? If the EXE is 73728 bytes long, then it's the latest. - Davide - To unsubscribe

[xmail] Re: GLST.EXE taking 100% CPU

2006-04-16 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Michal A. Valasek wrote: Hello, I was very busy last few months and been off the list, so sorry if you = already solved this. But I have the following problem: Sometimes GLST.EXE is frozen and take = 100% of CPU until killed. This is occuring about once per day on