I had some trouble scanning larger messages with filters.post-data, so I
opted to scan anything = 1MB with post-data and anything 1MB with
filters.in.
--John
Rob Arends wrote:
IIRC pre/post-data filters only work on incoming smtp (someone correct me
if wrong)
So it is a perfect place to
--- Matic wrote:
Is the filters.post-data.tab the right place to put
in a virus scanner?
Hi.
I think so. I think it is the right place because
XMail will close the session imediatelly. If we use
filters.in/out.tab and a sender writes a message to N
recipients, XMail will process N messages
Leonardo,
Sorry to go off topic here, but have you tried the tests at:
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
Using clamdscan in post-data, what tests to you fail on, if any?
Leonardo Fogel wrote:
The smtp session will be longer. So, maybe you will
need to raise the max number of smtp threads.
I
--- John Kielkopf wrote:
Sorry to go off topic here, but have you tried the
tests at:
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
Using clamdscan in post-data, what tests to you fail
on, if any?
Oops. I forgot to mention that in my previous mail. It
fails tests #5, 12, 16 and 24. Thankfully, the
Leonardo Fogel wrote:
--- John Kielkopf wrote:
Sorry to go off topic here, but have you tried the
tests at:
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
Using clamdscan in post-data, what tests to you fail
on, if any?
Oops. I forgot to mention that in my previous mail. It
fails tests #5, 12, 16
