lundi 29 décembre 2003 at 17:04:12, you said :
Davide> It's ok. Valgrind just uses a maximum number of 100 threads inside
Davide> include/vg_skin.h. For what I've seen there's no reason for the VM to
Davide> expand in the way you're experiencing. Later I'll send you a tar of the
Davide> 1.18 to t
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
> Another just after xmail has refuse all connexion :
>
>
> vg_alloc_ThreadState: no free slots available
> Increase VG_N_THREADS, rebuild and try again.
>
> valgrind: the `impossible' happened:
>VG_N_THREADS is too low
> Basic block ctr is approxi
Another just after xmail has refuse all connexion :
vg_alloc_ThreadState: no free slots available
Increase VG_N_THREADS, rebuild and try again.
valgrind: the `impossible' happened:
VG_N_THREADS is too low
Basic block ctr is approximately 296190
sched status:
Thread 1: status = Runnable
Hi Davide,
This is the morning report of xmail ;-)
dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 22:06:10, you said :
Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
>> Running from around 8pm..
Davide> Very good, leave it running if you can.
XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) server stopped
==2805== discard syms in
dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 22:06:10, you said :
Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
>> Running from around 8pm..
Davide> Very good, leave it running if you can.
I will for the night..
See you tomorrow..
>> ==31314== 200 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
> Running from around 8pm..
Very good, leave it running if you can.
> ==31314== 200 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 4
> ==31314==at 0x40218D6C: my_malloc (vg_libpthread.c:263)
> ==31314==by 0x4021A6FF: get_or_allocate_
Running from around 8pm..
==31314== discard syms in /lib/libnss_files-2.3.2.so due to munmap()
==31314== discard syms in /lib/libnss_dns-2.3.2.so due to munmap()
==31314== discard syms in /lib/libresolv-2.3.2.so due to munmap()
==31314==
==31314== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppress
dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 20:44:33, you said :
Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
Davide> Those are all harmless/one-time leaks. Please let XMail to run a little
Davide> bit more.
I understood, it's running now til 7 pm. :-)
Davide> Did XMail process any message during the ru
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
>
> I did it again, may be the clean was not correct !
>
> Are you agree with this result ? The function names are showed!
>
> XMail is running now under valgrind in Telnet session.
>
>
>
> I juste stopped a few secs to copy these informations :
Tho
I did it again, may be the clean was not correct !
Are you agree with this result ? The function names are showed!
XMail is running now under valgrind in Telnet session.
I juste stopped a few secs to copy these informations :
XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) server stopped
==31051== discard syms in /
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
>
> dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 18:49:17, you said :
>
> Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
>
> >> This is the first test with valgrind (15 minutes running) !
> >> Do you think my setup of it is correct and how many time I have
dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 18:49:17, you said :
Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
>> This is the first test with valgrind (15 minutes running) !
>> Do you think my setup of it is correct and how many time I have to
>> keep running before to read interesting result
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
>
> samedi 27 décembre 2003 at 21:05:54, you said :
>
> Davide> # valgrind -v --skin=addrcheck --num-callers=8
> Davide> --leak-check=yes --show-reachable=yes ./XMail -Md
>
>
> When I'm running Xmail with this command I have only 57212 Kb memory
> usi
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
> This is the first test with valgrind (15 minutes running) !
> Do you think my setup of it is correct and how many time I have to
> keep running before to read interesting result ?
You have to use the debug executable, like I described insid
samedi 27 décembre 2003 at 21:05:54, you said :
Davide> # valgrind -v --skin=addrcheck --num-callers=8
Davide> --leak-check=yes --show-reachable=yes ./XMail -Md
When I'm running Xmail with this command I have only 57212 Kb memory
using by the process
This number seems to be normal so run
Dear Davide,
This is the first test with valgrind (15 minutes running) !
Do you think my setup of it is correct and how many time I have to
keep running before to read interesting result ?
==30326== discard syms in /lib/libnss_files-2.3.2.so due to munmap()
==30326== discard syms in
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
>
> vendredi 26 décembre 2003 at 22:45:34, you said :
>
> Davide> Are you able to run valgrind on it?
>
> I didn't know this product!
>
> Davide> http://valgrind.kde.org/
>
> Davide> Basically you have to build XMail with -O0 -g and remove the strip
>
vendredi 26 décembre 2003 at 22:45:34, you said :
Davide> Are you able to run valgrind on it?
I didn't know this product!
Davide> http://valgrind.kde.org/
Davide> Basically you have to build XMail with -O0 -g and remove the strip
Davide> commands from Makefile.lnx. Then :
Davide> # make -f Ma
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
> First, Merry Christmas everybody :-)
>
> I have xmail 1.17 installed on RH9 managing around 500 domains. around
> 200 e-mail / hour
>
> When I start running xmail process, he needs 281MB, 24h after 360 and
> 3/4 days after 690 MB!. I hope it is a setup
TECTED]
Chad> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chad> On Behalf Of Pascal de R.
Chad> Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 4:44 AM
Chad> To: Bill Healy
Chad> Subject: [xmail] Re: To much memory ?
Chad> vendredi 26 d=E9cembre 2003 at 10:34:41, you said :
Bill>> Any filters or custom processin
] Re: To much memory ?
vendredi 26 d=E9cembre 2003 at 10:34:41, you said :
Bill> Any filters or custom processing?
Yes Anti-virus filter : http://xmail.libre-essai.com/
>>--
>>From: Pascal de R.[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Friday, December
vendredi 26 décembre 2003 at 10:34:41, you said :
Bill> Any filters or custom processing?
Yes Anti-virus filter : http://xmail.libre-essai.com/
>>--
>>From: Pascal de R.[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 1:11 AM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subjec
Any filters or custom processing?
Bill
>--
>From: Pascal de R.[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 1:11 AM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [xmail] To much memory ?
>
>First, Merry Christmas everybody :-)
>
>I have xmail 1.17 installed on RH9 managing aroun
23 matches
Mail list logo