[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-29 Thread Pascal de R.
lundi 29 décembre 2003 at 17:04:12, you said : Davide> It's ok. Valgrind just uses a maximum number of 100 threads inside Davide> include/vg_skin.h. For what I've seen there's no reason for the VM to Davide> expand in the way you're experiencing. Later I'll send you a tar of the Davide> 1.18 to t

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-29 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > Another just after xmail has refuse all connexion : > > > vg_alloc_ThreadState: no free slots available > Increase VG_N_THREADS, rebuild and try again. > > valgrind: the `impossible' happened: >VG_N_THREADS is too low > Basic block ctr is approxi

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-29 Thread Pascal de R.
Another just after xmail has refuse all connexion : vg_alloc_ThreadState: no free slots available Increase VG_N_THREADS, rebuild and try again. valgrind: the `impossible' happened: VG_N_THREADS is too low Basic block ctr is approximately 296190 sched status: Thread 1: status = Runnable

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-28 Thread Pascal de R.
Hi Davide, This is the morning report of xmail ;-) dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 22:06:10, you said : Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: >> Running from around 8pm.. Davide> Very good, leave it running if you can. XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) server stopped ==2805== discard syms in

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-28 Thread Pascal de R.
dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 22:06:10, you said : Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: >> Running from around 8pm.. Davide> Very good, leave it running if you can. I will for the night.. See you tomorrow.. >> ==31314== 200 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > Running from around 8pm.. Very good, leave it running if you can. > ==31314== 200 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 4 > ==31314==at 0x40218D6C: my_malloc (vg_libpthread.c:263) > ==31314==by 0x4021A6FF: get_or_allocate_

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-28 Thread Pascal de R.
Running from around 8pm.. ==31314== discard syms in /lib/libnss_files-2.3.2.so due to munmap() ==31314== discard syms in /lib/libnss_dns-2.3.2.so due to munmap() ==31314== discard syms in /lib/libresolv-2.3.2.so due to munmap() ==31314== ==31314== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppress

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-28 Thread Pascal de R.
dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 20:44:33, you said : Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: Davide> Those are all harmless/one-time leaks. Please let XMail to run a little Davide> bit more. I understood, it's running now til 7 pm. :-) Davide> Did XMail process any message during the ru

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > > I did it again, may be the clean was not correct ! > > Are you agree with this result ? The function names are showed! > > XMail is running now under valgrind in Telnet session. > > > > I juste stopped a few secs to copy these informations : Tho

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-28 Thread Pascal de R.
I did it again, may be the clean was not correct ! Are you agree with this result ? The function names are showed! XMail is running now under valgrind in Telnet session. I juste stopped a few secs to copy these informations : XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) server stopped ==31051== discard syms in /

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > > dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 18:49:17, you said : > > Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > > >> This is the first test with valgrind (15 minutes running) ! > >> Do you think my setup of it is correct and how many time I have

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-28 Thread Pascal de R.
dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 18:49:17, you said : Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: >> This is the first test with valgrind (15 minutes running) ! >> Do you think my setup of it is correct and how many time I have to >> keep running before to read interesting result

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > > samedi 27 décembre 2003 at 21:05:54, you said : > > Davide> # valgrind -v --skin=addrcheck --num-callers=8 > Davide> --leak-check=yes --show-reachable=yes ./XMail -Md > > > When I'm running Xmail with this command I have only 57212 Kb memory > usi

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > This is the first test with valgrind (15 minutes running) ! > Do you think my setup of it is correct and how many time I have to > keep running before to read interesting result ? You have to use the debug executable, like I described insid

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-28 Thread Pascal de R.
samedi 27 décembre 2003 at 21:05:54, you said : Davide> # valgrind -v --skin=addrcheck --num-callers=8 Davide> --leak-check=yes --show-reachable=yes ./XMail -Md When I'm running Xmail with this command I have only 57212 Kb memory using by the process This number seems to be normal so run

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-28 Thread Pascal de R.
Dear Davide, This is the first test with valgrind (15 minutes running) ! Do you think my setup of it is correct and how many time I have to keep running before to read interesting result ? ==30326== discard syms in /lib/libnss_files-2.3.2.so due to munmap() ==30326== discard syms in

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-27 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > > vendredi 26 décembre 2003 at 22:45:34, you said : > > Davide> Are you able to run valgrind on it? > > I didn't know this product! > > Davide> http://valgrind.kde.org/ > > Davide> Basically you have to build XMail with -O0 -g and remove the strip >

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-27 Thread Pascal de R.
vendredi 26 décembre 2003 at 22:45:34, you said : Davide> Are you able to run valgrind on it? I didn't know this product! Davide> http://valgrind.kde.org/ Davide> Basically you have to build XMail with -O0 -g and remove the strip Davide> commands from Makefile.lnx. Then : Davide> # make -f Ma

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-26 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > First, Merry Christmas everybody :-) > > I have xmail 1.17 installed on RH9 managing around 500 domains. around > 200 e-mail / hour > > When I start running xmail process, he needs 281MB, 24h after 360 and > 3/4 days after 690 MB!. I hope it is a setup

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-26 Thread Pascal de R.
TECTED] Chad> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Chad> On Behalf Of Pascal de R. Chad> Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 4:44 AM Chad> To: Bill Healy Chad> Subject: [xmail] Re: To much memory ? Chad> vendredi 26 d=E9cembre 2003 at 10:34:41, you said : Bill>> Any filters or custom processin

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-26 Thread Chad Fleenor
] Re: To much memory ? vendredi 26 d=E9cembre 2003 at 10:34:41, you said : Bill> Any filters or custom processing? Yes Anti-virus filter : http://xmail.libre-essai.com/ >>-- >>From: Pascal de R.[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Friday, December

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-26 Thread Pascal de R.
vendredi 26 décembre 2003 at 10:34:41, you said : Bill> Any filters or custom processing? Yes Anti-virus filter : http://xmail.libre-essai.com/ >>-- >>From: Pascal de R.[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 1:11 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subjec

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

2003-12-26 Thread Bill Healy
Any filters or custom processing? Bill >-- >From: Pascal de R.[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 1:11 AM >To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [xmail] To much memory ? > >First, Merry Christmas everybody :-) > >I have xmail 1.17 installed on RH9 managing aroun