[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-04 Thread Jeffrey Laramie
On Thursday 04 November 2004 14:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks, Jeff & Davide, for your inputs. > > Output from "netstat -t -n -a -p" before starting XMail (actual addresses > replaced with w.x.y.z to protect the identity of the guilty): > > Active Internet connections (servers and establish

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-04 Thread hamid
-- Original Message - From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 10:41 AM Subject: [xmail] Re: XMail Log Help > On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Jeff: > > > > Here's the co

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jeff: > > Here's the command line and output you asked for, including "socket bind > errors". > /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail -Md -Pl -Sl -Fl -Cl -Ll > SMAIL thread [00] started > SMAIL thread [01] started > SMAIL thread [02] started > SMAIL thread [03] sta

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-04 Thread Jeffrey Laramie
On Thursday 04 November 2004 13:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jeff: > > Here's the command line and output you asked for, including "socket bind > errors". > /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail -Md -Pl -Sl -Fl -Cl -Ll > SMAIL thread [00] started > SMAIL thread [01] started > SMAIL thread [02] started > SMAIL

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-04 Thread hamid
e" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 10:07 AM Subject: [xmail] Re: XMail Log Help > On Thursday 04 November 2004 11:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Jeff: > > > > Thanks for your reply. XMail $MAIL_ROOT/logs has

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-04 Thread Jeffrey Laramie
On Thursday 04 November 2004 11:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jeff: > > Thanks for your reply. XMail $MAIL_ROOT/logs has permissions set to: > > "drwxrwxrwx2 root root32768 Nov 4 07:32 . " > > and it runs as root anyway, so directory permissions should not be an > issue. When comm

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-04 Thread hamid
i" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:05 AM Subject: [xmail] Re: XMail Log Help > On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > No new smtp* or smail* files generated in $MAIL_ROOT/logs after changing > > XMAIL_CMD_LINE

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-04 Thread hamid
gt; Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 5:22 AM Subject: [xmail] Re: XMail Log Help > On Wednesday 03 November 2004 21:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > No new smtp* or smail* files generated in $MAIL_ROOT/logs after changing > > XMAIL_CMD_LINE="-Sl -Ql -Mr 24" in xmai

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > No new smtp* or smail* files generated in $MAIL_ROOT/logs after changing > XMAIL_CMD_LINE="-Sl -Ql -Mr 24" in xmail startup script and stopping and > starting XMail. Are the files written immediately after SMTP connection from > client or are they cach

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-04 Thread Jeffrey Laramie
On Wednesday 03 November 2004 21:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > No new smtp* or smail* files generated in $MAIL_ROOT/logs after changing > XMAIL_CMD_LINE="-Sl -Ql -Mr 24" in xmail startup script and stopping and > starting XMail. Are the files written immediately after SMTP connection > from client

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-03 Thread hamid
al Message - From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 4:41 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: XMail Log Help > On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Looking in the xmail start/stop script, it does not appear

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-03 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Looking in the xmail start/stop script, it does not appear that the log > writing is controlled from that script. With this: XMAIL_CMD_LINE="-Sl -Ql -Mr 24" in your startup script, XMail must generate logs inside $MAIL_ROOT/logs (assuming it is act

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-03 Thread hamid
-- > From: "Dale Qualls" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 3:47 AM > Subject: [xmail] Re: XMail Log Help > > > > LOL, heck, I'm still running 1.7 on the xMail server that I help > > administer.

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-03 Thread hamid
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 3:47 AM Subject: [xmail] Re: XMail Log Help > LOL, heck, I'm still running 1.7 on the xMail server that I help > administer. 1.8 kept dying so I never went up from there :) > > I'm waiting for the l

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-03 Thread Dale Qualls
LOL, heck, I'm still running 1.7 on the xMail server that I help administer. 1.8 kept dying so I never went up from there :) I'm waiting for the long-awaited IMAP version (which I know is in production, I'm not trying to push it). Thanks Davide for all of your hard work! >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-03 Thread Dale Qualls
Without grabbing and checking the manual for switches, those "l"'s are lowercase "L"'s, right? >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/2/2004 11:51:53 PM >>> Can anyone suggest any ideas to determine why XMail is not writing any log files? The xmail command line, as pasted from xmail executable in /etc/rc.d/init.

[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help

2004-11-02 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can anyone suggest any ideas to determine why XMail is not writing any log files? > The xmail command line, as pasted from xmail executable in /etc/rc.d/init.d, is: > XMAIL_CMD_LINE="-Sl -Ql -Mr 24" > > The XMail-related environment variables are pas