Re: [xmail] Tip: Speeding up xmail by pointing envvar XMAIL_TEMP to a ramdisk

2015-05-25 Thread Bart Mortelmans via xmail
Are you sure this will actually speed up XMail? Have you been able to compare, specifically for XMail? As far as I understand how XMail processes e-mails, it actually only creates a file one time and then moves that file around between temp-folder, spool folder and local POP3 folders. Moving

Re: [xmail] Tip: Speeding up xmail by pointing envvar XMAIL_TEMP to a ramdisk

2015-05-25 Thread U.Mutlu via xmail
Bart Mortelmans via xmail wrote on 05/25/2015 02:24 PM: Are you sure this will actually speed up XMail? Have you been able to compare, specifically for XMail? It will help for files xmail creates in /tmp and doesn't move to an other drive (for example when the realtime filters get fired during

[xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL

2015-05-25 Thread Oversea Site via xmail
I found the bug on XMAIL 1.27 with SSL (POP3S is main), SSMTP servicemaybe has asame bugtoo 1. it will have too many FIN_WAIT_2on POP3Swith two many requests, It is becauseof some non-popular WINDOWS CLIENT e.g. tencent foxmail , outlook will not have this issue. 2. If you're using

Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL

2015-05-25 Thread U.Mutlu via xmail
Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/25/2015 09:23 PM: I found the bug on XMAIL 1.27 with SSL (POP3S is main), SSMTP service maybe has a same bug too 1. it will have too many FIN_WAIT_2 on POP3S with two many requests, It is because of some non-popular WINDOWS CLIENT e.g. tencent foxmail ,

Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL

2015-05-25 Thread U.Mutlu via xmail
Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 05:14 AM: No Log Error. No Fatal Error log. No Core Dump It's not RAM or HW problem. It's XMAIL internal issue, because when I switch to stunnel, all problems solved. And then when I test K9-MAIL with XMAIL+STUNNEL, K9 Client will not have any JAVA

Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL

2015-05-25 Thread U.Mutlu via xmail
U.Mutlu via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 07:06 AM: Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 05:14 AM: No Log Error. No Fatal Error log. No Core Dump It's not RAM or HW problem. It's XMAIL internal issue, because when I switch to stunnel, all problems solved. And then when I test K9-MAIL with

Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL

2015-05-25 Thread Oversea Site via xmail
[root@bravo logs]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fin_timeout 10 [root@bravo logs]# Original Message From: U.Mutlu via xmail xmail@xmailserver.org To: U.Mutlu um4...@mutluit.com, XMail Users Mailing List xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:28 PM Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG :

Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL

2015-05-25 Thread Oversea Site via xmail
FEDORA 4 X86_64 GLIBC 2.3.6-3 (I can't upgrade it to the lastest version. Because I have a chiliasp 3.6.2 32-bit run ASP VBSCRIPT on APACHE 1.3 32-bit software, it need GLIBC 2.3.x and Kernel 2.6) KERNEL 3.3 MOD FROM FC15 (It will display KERNEL 2.6.43 Number). Kernel is not a main problem.

Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL

2015-05-25 Thread Oversea Site via xmail
No Log Error. No Fatal Error log. No Core Dump It's not RAM or HW problem. It's XMAIL internal issue, because when I switch to stunnel, all problems solved. And then when I test K9-MAIL with XMAIL+STUNNEL, K9 Client will not have any JAVA somethings Exception Error Two tests 1. Very Important