On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 12:25:55PM -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
> Here's the revised patch.
Okay, applied and commited,
thanks !
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.c
Here's the revised patch.
Rob
Rich Salz wrote:
Both fixes are correct. (I thought II returned the old value)
Can you post a revised patch so Daniel can commit it?
thanks for debugging my code. :)
Index: threads.c
===
RCS file: /cvs
Both fixes are correct. (I thought II returned the old value)
Can you post a revised patch so Daniel can commit it?
thanks for debugging my code. :)
--
Rich Salz Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.d
That one does compile. Get a warning now:
..\threads.c(702) : warning C4020: 'InterlockedIncrement' : too many
actual parameters
Shouldn't it be:
if (InterlockedIncrement(&run_once.control) == 1)
removed the second parameter and test == 1 (otherwise go into a nice
forever loop calling Sleep(0))
thanks. try this patch.
/r$
--
Rich Salz Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
*** threads.c.orig Thu Feb 24 10:06:35 2005
--- threads.c Thu Feb 24 11:28
Just tried it and it breaks my build (confirmed that patch was applied
correctly). Using VC++ 6 with default args other than debug=yes
mem_debug=yes
..\threads.c(112) : error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'int32'
..\threads.c(114) : error C2059: syntax error : '}'
..\threads.c(701) : error C2
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:15:58AM -0500, Rich Salz wrote:
> > Can you generate a patch ?
>
> Sure, attached. Untested. The code now looks similar to the beos code.
Hum, I can't test it, it didn't broke on Linux, I commited I hope
someone can give it a try on Windows,
thanks,
Daniel
--
> Can you generate a patch ?
Sure, attached. Untested. The code now looks similar to the beos code.
/r$
--
Rich Salz Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
***
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:33:11AM -0500, Rich Salz wrote:
> In threads.c for the windows platform it might be better to use
> InterlockedIncrement on run_once_init so that you get better pthread_once
> semantics. See this link for details
> http://pluto.cdpa.nsysu.edu.tw/sourceware/pthreads-win32
Yes but you MUST fix the problem on input. Especially for this kind
of stupid, obvious brokeness. I'm horribly serious about this, and
there is no garantee I will keep that mode available except for a couple
of API calls purely dedicated to recovery in the future.
You are warned, I already state
In threads.c for the windows platform it might be better to use
InterlockedIncrement on run_once_init so that you get better pthread_once
semantics. See this link for details
http://pluto.cdpa.nsysu.edu.tw/sourceware/pthreads-win32/sources/pthreads-snap-2005-01-25/pthread_once.c
--
Rich Salz
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:59:51PM +0200, Pieter Louw wrote:
> #The cleanest way I can think of to handle this
> #is to have a "forgiving" mode for libxml2 that treats bad entity references
> #as plain text.
>
> Is there currently a feature available to put the parser in "forgiving"
> mode?
Ye
#The cleanest way I can think of to handle this
#is to have a "forgiving" mode for libxml2 that treats bad entity references
#as plain text.
Is there currently a feature available to put the parser in "forgiving" mode?
___
xml mailing list, project page
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 01:01:04PM +0100, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 01:21:05PM +0200, Pieter Louw wrote:
> > That is my question, how do I convert the & to &?
> >
> > or are there no function to do this in libxml?
>
> As Daniel said, "Whatever generating this must be fix
14 matches
Mail list logo
