Miller bruce.mil...@nist.gov
To: Ming Chen ciming.c...@yahoo.com
Cc: xml@gnome.org xml@gnome.org; Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net;
mhy...@ustc.edu mhy...@ustc.edu
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 10:14 PM
Subject: Re: [xml] How could I understand the slightly difference of the
parsing process of E1
On 01/20/2012 12:46 AM, Ming Chen wrote:
Thank you Bruce,
My colleague began to have some approval of dealing a step (regardless of how
many predicates attached) as a whole, //rec/(para[1]). That is a big progress
for me.
We are following the XPath 2.0 spec. Are the both have the same behaviour
From: Bruce R Miller bruce.mil...@nist.gov
To: Ming Chen ciming.c...@yahoo.com
Cc: xml@gnome.org xml@gnome.org; Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 4:49 AM
Subject: Re: [xml] How could I understand the slightly difference of the
parsing process of E1/E2[E3
Hi Experts,
Recently a colleague and I have disagreed on the parsing process of the
E1/E2[E3], where E3 has a numeric type. Here is the example XML file:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
xml
table
rec id=1
para type=error position=11/
para type=warning position=12/
para type=warning position=13/
