[xml] Probably should not look for/use shl_load if dlopen is found (2.6.17)

On some HP-UX systems, both dlopen and shl_load are present. The 2.6.17 configure script seems to look for both of them and then xmlmodule.c does not prefer one over the other. When both shl_load and dlopen are present, we get duplicate definitions of the routines and that makes the compiler

Re: [xml] Probably should not look for/use shl_load if dlopen is found (2.6.17)

On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:51:22AM -0800, Rick Jones wrote: On some HP-UX systems, both dlopen and shl_load are present. The 2.6.17 configure script seems to look for both of them and then xmlmodule.c does not prefer one over the other. When both shl_load and dlopen are present, we get

Re: [xml] Probably should not look for/use shl_load if dlopen is found (2.6.17)

# diff -c xmlmodule.c.orig xmlmodule.c okay, makes sense. I made the changes, thanks ! BTW patches are better sent as mail attachments so they don't get messed up by the transport layers. (BTW, I changed my subcription to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from [EMAIL PROTECTED], so the approval stuff