Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:39:56PM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
Both approaches have a problem I can't seem to figure my way out of:
So don't do it.
I'm not going to do it any time soon, just running it by you to see
whether I comprehend it now or whether there was
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:39:56PM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 03:12:52PM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> >
> >>So what *is* stored in these dictionaries? I still don't know. Tagnames?
> >>Namespace strings? Text node content? IDs? All of them?
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 03:12:52PM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
So what *is* stored in these dictionaries? I still don't know. Tagnames?
Namespace strings? Text node content? IDs? All of them? I guess I'll
have to study the source to get the answer. :)
markup tag name,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 03:12:52PM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> So what *is* stored in these dictionaries? I still don't know. Tagnames?
> Namespace strings? Text node content? IDs? All of them? I guess I'll
> have to study the source to get the answer. :)
markup tag name, very small text n
Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Hi,
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Dictionaries won't grow indefinitely if I throw away nodes once every
while, right? The refcount will go down of dictionary values, to 0 if
it's a unique string, and the thing (tag name? text node value?) will
go away.
As far as I can see in t
Hi,
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey Daniel,
I hope you'll still answer the other part of my mail (the Relax NG
include processing errors).. that's a bit more urgent right now. :)
[...]
Dictionaries won't grow indefinitely if I throw away nodes once every
while, right? The refcount will go down of dict
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:42:57PM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey Daniel,
I hope you'll still answer the other part of my mail (the Relax NG
include processing errors).. that's a bit more urgent right now. :)
Well that mean going in a debug session (gdb etc...) and 1/
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:42:57PM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hey Daniel,
>
> I hope you'll still answer the other part of my mail (the Relax NG
> include processing errors).. that's a bit more urgent right now. :)
Well that mean going in a debug session (gdb etc...) and 1/ it takes
more
Hey Daniel,
I hope you'll still answer the other part of my mail (the Relax NG
include processing errors).. that's a bit more urgent right now. :)
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 11:35:52AM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
One note though, I'm using dictionnaries more and more intensi
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 11:35:52AM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> >One note though, I'm using dictionnaries more and more intensively those
> >days, so keeping a single dictionnary for everything, while it clearly
> >speed-up processing may grow quite a bit for example as you process random
> >doc
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:07:50AM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
no the base has to be set in the document. Since that part is just
described by '...' in your mail there is little more indications I can
provide.
Interesting. This is how a doc typically
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:07:50AM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > no the base has to be set in the document. Since that part is just
> >described by '...' in your mail there is little more indications I can
> >provide.
>
> Interesting. This is how a doc typically get p
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:14:22PM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
In my lxml Python binding for libxml2, I was using the following
approach to construct a Relax NG schemas:
xmlDocPtr* doc = ...
parser_ctxt = xmlRelaxNGNewDocParserCtxt(doc)
unfortunately, this got m
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:14:22PM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> In my lxml Python binding for libxml2, I was using the following
> approach to construct a Relax NG schemas:
>
> xmlDocPtr* doc = ...
> parser_ctxt = xmlRelaxNGNewDocParserCtxt(doc)
>
> unfortunately, this got me i
Hi there,
In my lxml Python binding for libxml2, I was using the following
approach to construct a Relax NG schemas:
xmlDocPtr* doc = ...
parser_ctxt = xmlRelaxNGNewDocParserCtxt(doc)
unfortunately, this got me into trouble with Relax NG schemas that use
the 'include' statement. They try to load
15 matches
Mail list logo
