Re: [xml] LibXML2 digitally signed?

2009-11-17 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:28:13PM -0800, Michael Shang wrote: Hi   I would like to know where I can find a version of the LibXML2library with the 32bits and 64bits dlls digitally signed? The one I downloaded on the website did not contain digital signature. I sign the rpms I produce for

Re: [xml] RelaxNG schema and entities file: namespace warning : Namespace default prefix was not found

2009-11-17 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 04:54:23PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: Hi, Consider this example: !DOCTYPE foo [ !ENTITY comment 'comment id=comment.xml /' ] foo xmlns=http://foo.bar/ns/foo; ... comment; ... /foo When I run `xmllint --noout --noent --relaxng foo.rng foo.xml' I receive:

Re: [xml] MSYS and MINGW: undefined reference to _imp__xmlFree

2009-11-17 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On 2009/11/09 at 01:26 AM, Igor Zlatkovic i...@zlatkovic.com wrote: On 05/11/09 12:50, Martin Schlemmer wrote: Hi, Sorry for the extra late reply - year end with all its deadlines, etc. As for fixing this issue - I guess the first will be to back out that patch again. Then I have thought

Re: [xml] MSYS and MINGW: undefined reference to _imp__xmlFree

2009-11-17 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On 2009/11/09 at 10:53 PM, Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info wrote: Martin Schlemmer wrote: On 11/8/2009 at 8:08 PM, Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info wrote: Roumen Petrov wrote: Martin Schlemmer wrote: Hi, [SNIP] It seems to me Martin is right but proposed patch is not

Re: [xml] MSYS and MINGW: undefined reference to _imp__xmlFree

2009-11-17 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On 2009/11/09 at 10:53 PM, Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info wrote: Igor Zlatkovic wrote: On 05/11/09 12:50, Martin Schlemmer wrote: [SNIP] 3. You may alter the output files on Windows, such as naming them differently (when I last tried, MSYS+MinGW produced a libxml2-2.dll, not the

[xml] xmllint: validating a document that doesn't specify a DTD

2009-11-17 Thread Murray Cumming
Should I be able to validate an XML document (such as a .glade file) that has no DOCTYPE line, and therefore doesn't specify a DTD? When I try it with xmllint, I get this error validity error : Validation failed: no DTD found ! even when I have specified a local DTD with --dtdvalid. --

[xml] Compilation fails with Sun Studio on Solaris 10

2009-11-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
Hello. libtool: compile: /opt/sunstudio12.1/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I./include -I../include -D_REENTRANT -I/opt/local/zlib//include -g -c ../relaxng.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/relaxng.o ../relaxng.c, line 5372: operands have incompatible types: pointer to char : pointer to const

Re: [xml] xmllint: validating a document that doesn't specify a DTD

2009-11-17 Thread Murray Cumming
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 14:24 +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:33:44PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: Should I be able to validate an XML document (such as a .glade file) that has no DOCTYPE line, and therefore doesn't specify a DTD? When I try it with xmllint, I get

Re: [xml] xmllint: validating a document that doesn't specify a DTD

2009-11-17 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 05:03:41PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 14:24 +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:33:44PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: Should I be able to validate an XML document (such as a .glade file) that has no DOCTYPE line, and