On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 09:26 -0400, Webb Scales wrote:
> Is it possible that the error message is wrong?
Like most parsers, if given faulty input the output is sometimes
unexpected.
I'm not a maintainer here, but i'd guess that a patch to detect the
case of the document having no XML elements in
Thank you for being so patient with me!
I did look at the XML grammar, but I only got far enough to suggest that
the prolog was optional. I should have continued on, but I was confused
by the error message from LibXML2 ("Extra content at the end of the
document") which seemed to indicate that
On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 00:47 -0400, Webb Scales wrote:
> Would a file containing just an XML comment, e.g.,
>
>
>
>
> be an acceptable input to LibXML2?
Let's look at the specification of XML,
https://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/
We see in section 2.1,
[[
[Definition: A textual object is a well-fo
