nsanely overkill measures.
>
> Eric
>
> *From:*xml [mailto:xml-boun...@gnome.org] *On Behalf Of *Webb Scales
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 29, 2019 7:18 AM
> *To:* Raphael de Carvalho Muniz
> *Cc:* xml@gnome.org
> *Subject:* Re: [xml] Research about vulnerabilities
>
>
Raphael de Carvalho Muniz
*Cc:* xml@gnome.org
*Subject:* Re: [xml] Research about vulnerabilities
Raphael,
First, the disclaimers: I'm not an XML maintainer or even a
contributor; and, I've only given this a cursory glance.
Here are my reactions.
First, the routine in question
insanely overkill measures.
Eric
From: xml [mailto:xml-boun...@gnome.org] On Behalf Of Webb Scales
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 7:18 AM
To: Raphael de Carvalho Muniz
Cc: xml@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [xml] Research about vulnerabilities
Raphael,
First, the disclaimers: I'm not a
Raphael,
First, the disclaimers: I'm not an XML maintainer or even a
contributor; and, I've only given this a cursory glance.
Here are my reactions.
First, the routine in question is declared to be of module static
scope. I believe that this means that any exploitation of it would have
to
On 29/10/2019 14:30, Raphael de Carvalho Muniz wrote:
I found in the commit history of Libxml2 (commit 9acef28) the presence of the
following code snippet in the libxml.c file (Lines 1,597 - 1,612).
More specifically python/libxml.c which is part of the Python bindings.
I believe
that this co
