What makes you think saving to a binary and loading from a binary would gain
much efficiency. Right now parsing an in-memory XML string with libxml2 is
close to 2 times faster than trying to copy the same preparsed xmlDocPtr
subtree.
I can achieve 3x efficiency in loading raw data from disk compar
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:40:43AM +0200, Aleksander Øhrn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a small search application where XML gets indexed, and where one at
> query-time may pull out any snippet from the XML using XPath. As part of this
> process I currently invoke xmlParsememory/2 at query-time in ord
Hi,
I have a small search application where XML gets indexed, and where one at
query-time may pull out any snippet from the XML using XPath. As part of this
process I currently invoke xmlParsememory/2 at query-time in order to get an
xmlDocPtr I can work with. A nice optimization would be to do