[xml] Is it a BUG for exclusive XML canonicalization in LibXML2?

2005-10-27 Thread small talk
I tried to do a exclusive C14N on SignedInfo in the attacthed 'Sample.xml', the result from .Net SDK and LibXML2(2.6.20) (both attacthed)are different! It seems that the LibXML2 will generate an extra empty default namespace on CanonicalizationMethodcompared to .Net SDK. I have read the

Re: [xml] Is it a BUG for exclusive XML canonicalization in LibXML2?

2005-10-27 Thread Richard Salz
Something else is going wrong; the Sample.xml has whitespace within the SignedInfo element. There are *no* spaces in the byDotNot document. Somehow you didn't give the two algorithms the same piece of XML to work on. /r$ ___ xml mailing

Re: [xml] Is it a BUG for exclusive XML canonicalization in LibXML2?

2005-10-27 Thread Aleksey Sanin
Anyway, the 'extra' empty default namespace generated on CanonicalizationMethod by LibXML2 mentioned in my first mail violates the http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-exc-c14n/ if my understanding of that spec is correct. Yes, you are correct. There is a bug in libxml2 c14n module. I appologize for