Re: [xml] Problem resolving relative URIs during catalog resolution, potential regression as of libxml2 2.9.2 (patch included)

2017-08-28 Thread Daniel Veillard
Hi Matthias, it took a while but I looked at this today, indeed that's a serious regression however your patch needed a bit of work to avoid potential segfaults. Also I found that condition in a couple of place in the code. Resulting fix is commited to git head:

Re: [xml] Problem resolving relative URIs during catalog resolution, potential regression as of libxml2 2.9.2 (patch included)

2016-12-06 Thread Matthias Pigulla
Daniel, >TL/DR: > >./testURI --base file:///some/where file > >Without patch: file:/some/file >With patch: file:///some/file is this a regression you think should be fixed and does the patch look reasonable? Would it help if I opened a bug for this? Kind regards Matthias

[xml] Problem resolving relative URIs during catalog resolution, potential regression as of libxml2 2.9.2 (patch included)

2016-11-24 Thread Matthias Pigulla
Hello libxml2 developers, TL/DR: ./testURI --base file:///some/where file Without patch: file:/some/file With patch: file:///some/file Full report: I am using PHP to read a simple XML file and see a regression between libxml 2.9.1 and 2.9.2, with the problem still present in 2.9.4. File: