Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-31 Thread Ron Ohmer
Mmmm MidgetsIgor Zlatkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bruce Miller wrote:> Getting even more OT...> Do you really need FTP? I've been trying to ween away from it.> The speed advantage seems to have become minimal, and it's trickier to > secure.> Our sysadmins insist on configuring the ftp server wi

Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-31 Thread Ron Ohmer
 Any midgets on this list want to make $100?Aron Stansvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What FTP software are you running? Shouldn't most FTP servers (on mostplatforms?) support something like symlinks or equivalent? Could asymlink or equivalent solution for FTP, and a redirect solution forHTTP be an

Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-23 Thread Igor Zlatkovic
Aron Stansvik wrote: What FTP software are you running? Shouldn't most FTP servers (on most platforms?) support something like symlinks or equivalent? Could a symlink or equivalent solution for FTP, and a redirect solution for HTTP be an alternative? Hm, tricky buissness you have :) I run vsftpd on

Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-23 Thread Aron Stansvik
What FTP software are you running? Shouldn't most FTP servers (on most platforms?) support something like symlinks or equivalent? Could a symlink or equivalent solution for FTP, and a redirect solution for HTTP be an alternative? Hm, tricky buissness you have :) Aron On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:48:07

Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-23 Thread Igor Zlatkovic
Bruce Miller wrote: Getting even more OT... Do you really need FTP? I've been trying to ween away from it. The speed advantage seems to have become minimal, and it's trickier to secure. Our sysadmins insist on configuring the ftp server with reverse dns checks, with the consequence that every cou

AW: AW: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-23 Thread Keim, Markus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Igor Zlatkovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. März 2005 18:50 An: Keim, Markus Cc: xml@gnome.org Betreff: Re: AW: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web > Keim, Markus wrote: > > Hello Igor, hello all, > > > > I guess

Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-23 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 12:52:16PM -0500, Bruce Miller wrote: > Getting even more OT... > Do you really need FTP? I've been trying to ween away from it. yes for mirroring on xmlsoft.org ! HTTP mirroring is a joke. Unless I get rsync access do not remove FTP access please ! Daniel -- Daniel V

Re: AW: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-23 Thread Igor Zlatkovic
Keim, Markus wrote: Hello Igor, hello all, I guess using an appropriate servlet filter it should be possible to redirect each request that goes *not* to the latest release and (transparently) serve it from the "oldrelease" directory. I happily offer to set up an example (if that's necessary, which

Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-23 Thread Bruce Miller
Igor Zlatkovic wrote: Bruce Miller wrote: Rich Salz wrote: Can you implement a tomcat filter that looks to see if someone is asking for the "latest" version and if so send them an http redirect? Nice suggestion! I like that idea. The usual approach of foo-latest.tar.gz symlinks is annoying in that

Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-23 Thread Igor Zlatkovic
Bruce Miller wrote: Rich Salz wrote: Can you implement a tomcat filter that looks to see if someone is asking for the "latest" version and if so send them an http redirect? Nice suggestion! I like that idea. The usual approach of foo-latest.tar.gz symlinks is annoying in that you end up with tarbal

Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-23 Thread Igor Zlatkovic
Rich Salz wrote: Can you implement a tomcat filter that looks to see if someone is asking for the "latest" version and if so send them an http redirect? Sure, I allready did that sort of thing: http://www.zlatkovic.com/httpredirectfilter.en.html Slightly modified to retarget the redirection dynam

Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-23 Thread Bruce Miller
Rich Salz wrote: Can you implement a tomcat filter that looks to see if someone is asking for the "latest" version and if so send them an http redirect? Nice suggestion! I like that idea. The usual approach of foo-latest.tar.gz symlinks is annoying in that you end up with tarballs in your filesyste

AW: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-23 Thread Keim, Markus
ome.org Betreff: Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Igor Zlatkovic wrote: > > >>Both links refer to the same storage. Should I keep moving everything >>but the newest stuff into the 'oldreleases' subdirectory

Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-23 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:30:08PM +0100, Igor Zlatkovic wrote: > I presently practice to keep only the latest releases in /pub/libxml on > my site. All older releases are being moved to /pub/libxml/oldreleases. > This I do for novice users who visit the site with a browser. They see > all the p

Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-22 Thread Rich Salz
Can you implement a tomcat filter that looks to see if someone is asking for the "latest" version and if so send them an http redirect? -- Rich Salz Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/p

Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-22 Thread Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Igor Zlatkovic wrote: > Oh, Adam, I would love the symlink, it would solve few other problems I > have in addition to this one. But the whole website is a web > application, served by a servlet container, currently Apache Tomcat. The > thing is, servlet's platform, Java, has n

Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-22 Thread Igor Zlatkovic
Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote: On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Igor Zlatkovic wrote: Both links refer to the same storage. Should I keep moving everything but the newest stuff into the 'oldreleases' subdirectory, or should I rather keep everything right there where it was released? Or would it be best to

Re: [xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-22 Thread Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Igor Zlatkovic wrote: > Both links refer to the same storage. Should I keep moving everything > but the newest stuff into the 'oldreleases' subdirectory, or should I > rather keep everything right there where it was released? Or would it be > best to even separate the packages

[xml] Windows Binaries And The Web

2005-03-22 Thread Igor Zlatkovic
Hello there, This is on the edge of the topic, but I need an advice and am writing to the list in hope that many of you who use libxml in many ways will know what must be done. I was examining my server's logs and have paid some attention on how people access my site and who directs them to it.