Not really important but I think it more appropriate to call libxml.so
a shared library rather than shareable library.
Note, this is wrong for HP-UX where it should be libxml.sl. How should
we fix this? Should we even bother?
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-- snip snip
Index: libxml.3
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:10:46AM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
Not really important but I think it more appropriate to call libxml.so
a shared library rather than shareable library.
okay, though that man page look so outdated :-)
Note, this is wrong for HP-UX where it should be libxml.sl. How
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:53:42AM -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:10:46AM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
Note, this is wrong for HP-UX where it should be libxml.sl. How should
we fix this? Should we even bother?
Honnestly I would not bother,
I'll second what Daniel said - for example, there are enough things using
libtool now that there are shared libs on HP-UX with the .so extension.
For IA64, yes. However, not for PA-RISC.
Could be, I've only been playing on IA64 recently - netperf4 stuff - but then it
all gets abstracted
