[xml] xmllint: validating a document that doesn't specify a DTD
Should I be able to validate an XML document (such as a .glade file) that has no DOCTYPE line, and therefore doesn't specify a DTD? When I try it with xmllint, I get this error validity error : Validation failed: no DTD found ! even when I have specified a local DTD with --dtdvalid. -- murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ xml@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
Re: [xml] xmllint: validating a document that doesn't specify a DTD
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 14:24 +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:33:44PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: Should I be able to validate an XML document (such as a .glade file) that has no DOCTYPE line, and therefore doesn't specify a DTD? When I try it with xmllint, I get this error validity error : Validation failed: no DTD found ! even when I have specified a local DTD with --dtdvalid. Works for me with the version from git head: Thanks. I was actually using xmllint --valid --dtdvalid mydtd.dtd mydoc.xml So is --dtdvalid an alternative to --valid rather than a way of using --valid? -- murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ xml@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
Re: [xml] xmllint: validating a document that doesn't specify a DTD
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 05:03:41PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 14:24 +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:33:44PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: Should I be able to validate an XML document (such as a .glade file) that has no DOCTYPE line, and therefore doesn't specify a DTD? When I try it with xmllint, I get this error validity error : Validation failed: no DTD found ! even when I have specified a local DTD with --dtdvalid. Works for me with the version from git head: Thanks. I was actually using xmllint --valid --dtdvalid mydtd.dtd mydoc.xml So is --dtdvalid an alternative to --valid rather than a way of using --valid? and alternative, as DTD validation as defined in the XML-1.0 spec is --valid i.e. validating as parsing based on DOCTYPE contained in the document, and --dtdvalid is just a different kind of validation closely related, but certainly different, and in subtle case you may see different results (but in general it will be the same !) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ dan...@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ ___ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ xml@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
