Greg Wilson wrote:
> Mm. So people would have to:
>
> * download two supplementary libraries
one is a Python module, one is a parser. both are available as prebuilt kits
for many
platforms.
> * parse with one
>
> * transform the nodes produced by that parser from one format to another
no, th
Greg Wilson wrote:
...[I] would like advice on which of Python's many XML toolkits to use [in a
course].
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
have you looked at ElementRXP?
http://online.effbot.org/2005_02_01_archive.htm#elementrxp
Mm. So people would have to:
* download two supplementary libraries
* parse
Greg Wilson wrote:
> Hi everyone. I'm about to start work on the XML data crunching lectures for
> the PSF-funded
> software development course [1], and would like advice on which of Python's
> many XML toolkits to
> use. The default choice is minidom, but having taught with it for a couple
Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed.
Warning: Please read the "VirusWarning.txt" attachment(s) for more information.
The message was not delivered due to the following reason(s):
Your message was not delivered because the destination computer was
unreachable within the a
Hi everyone. I'm about to start work on the XML data crunching lectures
for the PSF-funded software development course [1], and would like
advice on which of Python's many XML toolkits to use. The default
choice is minidom, but having taught with it for a couple of semesters,
I find it clunky
the same patch with just outdated comments removed...
--
Sylvain Thénault LOGILAB, Paris (France).
http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org
--- /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/_xmlplus/sax/saxutils.py 2004-11-29
13:36:36.0 +
the updated patch...
--
Sylvain Thénault LOGILAB, Paris (France).
http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org
--- /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/_xmlplus/sax/saxutils.py 2004-11-29
13:36:36.0 +0100
+++ cvs_work/_xmlplus/sax/sa
On Friday 08 April à 00:56, Mike Brown wrote:
> Sylvain Thénault wrote:
> > after some times working on other stuff, I've remembered that I had
> > still the prepare_input_source patch pending. I've joined to this
> > message the patch as it is now, and it's well working for me. I'll
> > check it i
