Re: [XML-SIG] elementtree ProcessingInstructions

2005-12-19 Thread Werner F. Bruhin
Lars Marius Garshol wrote: > > * Werner F. Bruhin > . > >> I like it at the top of the file and not in the middle. I was starting >> with a doc containing the root, but I think I am changing this in which >> case I could do this append as the first thing. > > > Exactly. :) But :-( it does

Re: [XML-SIG] elementtree ProcessingInstructions

2005-12-19 Thread Werner F. Bruhin
Hi Lars, Lars Marius Garshol wrote: >* Werner F. Bruhin > > >>I think that the following are considered ProcessingInstructions. >> >> >> >> >>Am I correct? >> >> > >Only about the second one. The first one is the XML declaration, and >is not considered a processing instruction, despite be

Re: [XML-SIG] elementtree ProcessingInstructions

2005-12-19 Thread Lars Marius Garshol
* Werner F. Bruhin > > I think that the following are considered ProcessingInstructions. > > > > > Am I correct? Only about the second one. The first one is the XML declaration, and is not considered a processing instruction, despite being syntactically extremely similar. > If yes how do I

Re: [XML-SIG] elementtree ProcessingInstructions

2005-12-19 Thread Chuck Bearden
On 12/19/05, Werner F. Bruhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that the following are considered ProcessingInstructions. > > > > > Am I correct? The first is an XML declaration, rather than a processing instruction.. See the XML specification for more info on this: