Re: [XML-SIG] prepare_input_source and relative path

2005-02-10 Thread Sylvain Thénault
On Wednesday 09 February à 16:06, Mike Brown wrote: > Sylvain Thénault wrote: > > thanks a lot. Actually almost all the work is already done right there. > > Here is what I've worked on. Once we'll reach a consensus, I'll add that > > to pyxml. So I've joined to this mail: > > > > - a light versi

Re: [XML-SIG] prepare_input_source and relative path

2005-02-10 Thread Mike Brown
Sylvain ThÃnault wrote: > done. However, does sections of rfc 2396bis match sections of rfc 3986 ? Yes. There were only very minor editorial changes in the last drafts before rfc2396bis became RFC 3986. > I did found them. As I said I've run relevant tests again the restricted > version of Uri.p

[XML-SIG] Returned mail: see transcript for details

2005-02-10 Thread MAILER-DAEMON
The original message was received at Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:21:22 -1000 from python.org [5.86.142.153] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - xml-sig@python.org - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to python.org.: >>> MAIL From:"MAILER-DAEMON" <[EMAIL P

[XML-SIG] More Pythonic XML creation

2005-02-10 Thread John W. Shipman
Thanks for all the replies to my inquiry about creation of documents from scratch using the DOM. I've rewritten my document "Python and the XML DOM" to conform to the way the Python 2.3 xml.dom.minidom module wants you to use factory methods: see section 6, `Creating a document from scratch' in th