Re: [XML-SIG] Where is the xml.dom.ext package in current pythondistributions? .ext documentation?

2007-02-07 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Anastasios Hatzis schrieb: >> Parts of PyXML were integrated into Python 2.0, namely xml.dom, >> xml.sax, and pyexpat. Other parts were never considered for inclusion, >> for various reasons. >> > > Martin, thank you for your notice. I wonder if the mentioned parts are > developed as "forks". Do

Re: [XML-SIG] Where is the xml.dom.ext package in current pythondistributions? .ext documentation?

2007-02-07 Thread Anastasios Hatzis
Martin v. Löwis wrote: ... > > Parts of PyXML were integrated into Python 2.0, namely xml.dom, > xml.sax, and pyexpat. Other parts were never considered for inclusion, > for various reasons. > Martin, thank you for your notice. I wonder if the mentioned parts are developed as "forks". Do you k

Re: [XML-SIG] Where is the xml.dom.ext package in current pythondistributions? .ext documentation?

2007-02-07 Thread Anastasios Hatzis
Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Anastasios Hatzis schrieb: > >>> Parts of PyXML were integrated into Python 2.0, namely xml.dom, >>> xml.sax, and pyexpat. Other parts were never considered for inclusion, >>> for various reasons. >>> >> >> Martin, thank you for your notice. I wonder if the mentioned parts

Re: [XML-SIG] Where is the xml.dom.ext package in current pythondistributions? .ext documentation?

2007-02-07 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Anastasios Hatzis schrieb: > Is the xml.dom entirely -with all subpackages/modules- available under > the same package in Python? Not at all. Not with all subpackages; primarily, just minidom is included (and pulldom and the DOM builder). > # (1) for reading/parsing data from XML: > from xml.d