Hi, trying to build the package from the tarball on NixOS, it appears
that fuzz/fuzz.h is missing from the archive:
testFuzzer.c:13:10: fatal error: fuzz.h: No such file or directory
13 | #include "fuzz.h"
| ^~~~
compilation terminated.
It appears to be available in the git
P, I am way way behind, but now that CVE-2021-3541 is out I just pushed
that long awaited release. libxml2 2.9.11 is tagged in git and a signed
tarball is available at the usual place:
ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/
This release incoporate the various security and quadatic patches that
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 05:52:16PM +0200, Jan Tojnar wrote:
> Hi, trying to build the package from the tarball on NixOS, it appears that
> fuzz/fuzz.h is missing from the archive:
>
> testFuzzer.c:13:10: fatal error: fuzz.h: No such file or directory
> 13 | #include "fuzz.h"
> |
Salut Daniel,
Daniel Veillard via xml schrieb am 13.05.21 um 15:54:
> P, I am way way behind, but now that CVE-2021-3541 is out I just pushed
> that long awaited release. libxml2 2.9.11 is tagged in git and a signed
> tarball is available at the usual place:
>
>
Jan Tojnar schrieb am 13.05.21 um 21:44:
>> I fail to build libxslt 1.1.34 against it. The "configure" script of
>> libxslt has this line:
>
> libxml2 now behaves more correctly by rejecting invalid arguments like
> `print`. This is fixed in libxslt master so it no longer passes it the
> extra
Oh well, a little bit of shame is better than a long lasting pain,
so 2.9.12 is out and it now includes everything to build outside of
a git checkout tree !
Sorry about that, and thanks for reporting it !
Daniel
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 08:14:04PM +0200, Daniel Veillard via xml wrote:
> On
> I fail to build libxslt 1.1.34 against it. The "configure" script of
> libxslt has this line:
libxml2 now behaves more correctly by rejecting invalid arguments like
`print`. This is fixed in libxslt master so it no longer passes it the
extra print argument.
In the meanwhile, you can use
