Re: [xmlblaster] When does a topic get marked dead?

2004-06-10 Thread Marcel Ruff
David Kerry wrote: On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 10:47:46PM +0200, Michele Laghi wrote: Hi David, David Kerry wrote: I hit enter to publish a message and it gets published, the topic gets created on the server and is subsequently marked 'DEAD'. Two messages show up in the subscriber window - the publi

Re: [xmlblaster] When does a topic get marked dead?

2004-06-09 Thread David Kerry
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 10:47:46PM +0200, Michele Laghi wrote: > Hi David, > > David Kerry wrote: > >I hit enter to publish a message and it gets published, the > >topic gets created on the server and is subsequently marked 'DEAD'. > > > >Two messages show up in the subscriber window - the publi

Re: [xmlblaster] When does a topic get marked dead?

2004-06-09 Thread Michele Laghi
Hi David, David Kerry wrote: On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 06:08:19PM +0200, Marcel Ruff wrote: Try this: java org.xmlBlaster.Main -call[core] true java javaclients.HelloWorldPublish -lifeTime 0 -destroyDelay 0 you can see in the server log how the topic disappears (type 'd' in the server console to v

Re: [xmlblaster] When does a topic get marked dead?

2004-06-09 Thread David Kerry
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 06:08:19PM +0200, Marcel Ruff wrote: > Try this: > > java org.xmlBlaster.Main -call[core] true > > java javaclients.HelloWorldPublish -lifeTime 0 -destroyDelay 0 > > you can see in the server log how the topic disappears > (type 'd' in the server console to verify it

Re: [xmlblaster] When does a topic get marked dead?

2004-06-08 Thread Michele Laghi
Hi David, David Kerry wrote: Hi Michele, Right now, we're using PubSub, all clients are connected before a publish (losing the odd message is ok in our environment) and we are setting the isVolatile() on all messages as well. Shouldn't setting the volatile flag (as we're already doing) cause the to

Re: [xmlblaster] When does a topic get marked dead?

2004-06-08 Thread David Kerry
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 06:08:19PM +0200, Marcel Ruff wrote: > David Kerry wrote: > >So I guess the question is - how can I force xmlblaster to check > >for dead topics more often and clean them out? > > Hi David, > > you've summarized it quite exactly already. > The best solution is to use name

Re: [xmlblaster] When does a topic get marked dead?

2004-06-08 Thread David Kerry
Hi Michele, Right now, we're using PubSub, all clients are connected before a publish (losing the odd message is ok in our environment) and we are setting the isVolatile() on all messages as well. Shouldn't setting the volatile flag (as we're already doing) cause the topics to get destroyed right

Re: [xmlblaster] When does a topic get marked dead?

2004-06-08 Thread Marcel Ruff
David Kerry wrote: Hello, We used to run xmlblaster v0.8 for quite some time, but have now moved to v0.9. Everything is running fine, but we have a problem where xmlblaster keeps running out of memory. We're using ram based storage for now (which we also used in the v0.8 version). This shouldn't b

Re: [xmlblaster] When does a topic get marked dead?

2004-06-08 Thread Michele Laghi
hallo David, As I see it you have several possibilities to solve your problem: first of all you should consider structuring your system in such a way to get a limited amount of topics. Topic creation is timeconsuming and should be kept to a minimum. An alternative to the described approach would

[xmlblaster] When does a topic get marked dead?

2004-06-08 Thread David Kerry
Hello, We used to run xmlblaster v0.8 for quite some time, but have now moved to v0.9. Everything is running fine, but we have a problem where xmlblaster keeps running out of memory. We're using ram based storage for now (which we also used in the v0.8 version). This shouldn't be a problem as o