Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
>> Depends on the patch. ;-)
>
>> I understand the use case and I definitely would want it to be
>> supported. I am currently just unsure, whether this isn't already
>> possible, but I assume you have checked sufficiently.
>
Jochen,
B)
I am slowly getting acquainted
On 7/19/06, Jimisola Laursen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I gladly provide a patch for either solution if you find it interesting.
Will it be able to make the 3.0 final then?
Depends on the patch. ;-)
I understand the use case and I definitely would want it to be
supported. I am currently just
Hi!
After some work I managed to get 3.0b1 up and running just fine.
However, I have a question about / some input on the inner-workings of
ReflectiveXmlRpcHandler that I saw when I checked the code.
I have a state-less instance, but it needs to be initalized with some
objects initally. This mig
