Re: Radeon Mobility X1600 texture garbage w/ compiz skydome

2008-09-22 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 08:27 -0700, Corbin Simpson wrote: Michel Dänzer wrote: On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 13:35 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: [...] (**) RADEON(0): Option GARTSize 64 (**) RADEON(0): Option FBTexPercent 0 Try without these two options. For the former, values

Re: Raw mouse input is distorted

2008-09-22 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:29:58PM +0200, Søren Hauberg wrote: I do have a follow-up question (you can't get rid of me that easy :-) ). I have modified the 'usbtouchscreen' kernel module such that it can use calibration parameters. With this in place, my touchscreen works in X with the 'evdev'

Re: Raw mouse input is distorted

2008-09-22 Thread Simon Thum
Søren Hauberg wrote: I'm sorry but I don't quite understand (I don't know that much about either X, nor the kernel). But you think it would be better to solve this in X, right? Via a special driver for touch screens? And then I can use these 'device properties' to set the calibration

Re: Raw mouse input is distorted

2008-09-22 Thread Søren Hauberg
2008/9/22 Peter Hutterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:29:58PM +0200, Søren Hauberg wrote: I do have a follow-up question (you can't get rid of me that easy :-) ). I have modified the 'usbtouchscreen' kernel module such that it can use calibration parameters. With this in

Re: Keymap issues with Pointer+Keys device

2008-09-22 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:58:56AM +0200, Sascha Hlusiak wrote: BTW: With MPX, having two key devices attached to the first master device works fine, regarding the keymap. When creating a second master and attaching a keyboard to that, key presses seem to use the keymap of the first master

Re: Optimization idea: soft XvPutImage

2008-09-22 Thread Adam Richter
--- On Mon, 9/22/08, Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 13:58 +0200, Soeren Sandmann wrote: As other people pointed out, XRender does allow arbitrary 3x3 transformations of source images, but you are right that the XRender protocol would require putting the

[PATCH 0/3] X Input 1.5 device properties (final patches)

2008-09-22 Thread Peter Hutterer
Here's the (hopefully) final patches to device properties in the server. As mentioned in [1], Configure/Query property functionality and requests have been culled. Patch 1 removes these requests. An updated inputproto is required as well of course. Patch 2 allows property handlers to return

[PATCH 3/3] Xi: ask handlers before deletion of property.

2008-09-22 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Peter Hutterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add delete parameter to SetProperty handler, handlers can refuse to delete a property by returning something other than Success. --- Xi/xiproperty.c| 20 ++-- dix/devices.c |6 +- include/exevents.h |3 ++-

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Xi: ask handlers before deletion of property.

2008-09-22 Thread Simon Thum
Hi Peter, its good news you're done with that. A thing though: -DeviceSetProperty(DeviceIntPtr dev, Atom property, XIPropertyValuePtr prop) +DeviceSetProperty(DeviceIntPtr dev, Atom property, XIPropertyValuePtr prop, + BOOL delete) { if (property ==

what card is well supported? recommendations?

2008-09-22 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
As I'm tired of constant fighting with nvidia (and nvidia obsoleted my current graphics card, GeForce FX 5200), I'm looking for a graphics card which has open drivers and is well supported. If it matters, I use 32 bit Linux. I looked a bit in X.org wiki, and it seems to me that Radeons with

Re: Building X

2008-09-22 Thread Adam Jackson
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 16:55 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 13:52 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: You don't ask for the stipple though. It's the default. My point was that if you want to avoid the vintage X appearance, you'd likely start the X server with a black root window

Re: [PATCH] Don't remap windows for SaveSetUnmap

2008-09-22 Thread Adam Jackson
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 17:27 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: I found that XFixesChangeSaveSet (..., SaveSetRoot, SaveSetUnmap); isn't working as expected ... when the client terminates, the save-set window will be reparented to the root window, but the window manager will get a MapRequest

Re: [PATCH] xkb: fix core keyboard map generation. #14373

2008-09-22 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 12:15:33PM +0930, Peter Hutterer wrote: According to Section 12.4 of the XKB Protocol Spec, if a key only has a single group but the keyboard has multiple groups defined, the core description of the key is a duplication of the single group across all symbols. i.e. G1L1

Re: Building Xephyr

2008-09-22 Thread Matthieu Herrb
Yan Seiner wrote: I am new to building X. I'd like to take a shot at building Xephyr from git. I've been through the instructions on http://www.x.org/wiki/Development/git but xserver doesn't appear to have xephyr. Is there a list somewhere of what module contains which part? Where do

current git head of Xserver segfaults on a keyhit

2008-09-22 Thread Lukas Hejtmanek
Hello, the current git head of the Xserver segfaults on any keystroke. Trace is attached: (I have the core file and all the binaries, if interested) Core was generated by `/usr/local/X11R7.5/bin/Xorg :1.0'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. [New process 28180] #0

Re: Current intel from git + xserver 1.5.0 + FreeBSD

2008-09-22 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:09:45 -0400 Adam K Kirchhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to get that combination working on my i915 laptop, but I'm running into a problem... Namely, Xorg is crashing: X.Org X Server 1.5.0 Release Date: X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating

Re: Current intel from git + xserver 1.5.0 + FreeBSD

2008-09-22 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:02:25 -0400 Adam K Kirchhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:09:45 -0400 Adam K Kirchhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to get that combination working on my i915 laptop, but I'm running into a problem... Namely, Xorg is crashing:

Re: Building X

2008-09-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:56:03AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: Right then. -br is now the default. -retro gives you the old school root window and cursor behavior. I don't understand why you don't leave the default as it was. Sureley the only situation where it is inconvenient to have to

Poll: Should Xorg change from using Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to something harder for users to press by accident?

2008-09-22 Thread Jason Spiro
Problem: Many[1] users have killed X by accident.[2] Solution idea: Make it harder to kill X by accident. E.g. you could change the key sequence users must press. * Maybe require Control+Alt+Backspace then Control-Alt-Y.[3] * Or require Control+K+X pressed simultaneously. What do you

Re: Poll: Should Xorg change from using Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to something harder for users to press by accident?

2008-09-22 Thread Jason Spiro
Igor Mozolevsky igor at hybrid-lab.co.uk writes: CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE is just the way to do it OK. That's one no vote, duly noted. Thank you for your vote. I will now respond to the rest of your comments. just because users incompetently press the combination, doesn't mean it's a bad one.

Re: Poll: Should Xorg change from using Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to something harder for users to press by accident?

2008-09-22 Thread Tiago Vignatti
Jason Spiro escreveu: Problem: Many[1] users have killed X by accident.[2] Solution idea: Make it harder to kill X by accident. E.g. you could change the key sequence users must press. * Maybe require Control+Alt+Backspace then Control-Alt-Y.[3] * Or require Control+K+X pressed

Re: Poll: Should Xorg change from using Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to something harder for users to press by accident?

2008-09-22 Thread Corbin Simpson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason Spiro wrote: Problem: Many[1] users have killed X by accident.[2] Solution idea: Make it harder to kill X by accident. E.g. you could change the key sequence users must press. * Maybe require Control+Alt+Backspace then

Re: Poll: Should Xorg change from using Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to something harder for users to press by accident?

2008-09-22 Thread Igor Mozolevsky
2008/9/23 Jason Spiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Igor Mozolevsky igor at hybrid-lab.co.uk writes: just because users incompetently press the combination, doesn't mean it's a bad one. I respectfully disagree. Accidental zaps often cause data loss. Data loss is always unacceptable and Xorg should

Re: Poll: Should Xorg change from using Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to something harder for users to press by accident?

2008-09-22 Thread Jason Spiro
Igor Mozolevsky igor at hybrid-lab.co.uk wrote: ... Unfortunately, there's no cure for human stupidity There's no cure, but there are workarounds. Doesn't CTRL+ALT+DELETE reboot the machine unconditionally? Not usually. It used to reboot unconditionally way back. But, fifteen years ago,

Re: Poll: Should Xorg change from using Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to something harder for users to press by accident?

2008-09-22 Thread Jason Spiro
Corbin Simpson mostawesomedude at gmail.com writes: ... Seriously, no. Your vote has been duly noted. Zap once, learn forever. No different than anything else, really; I still believe that Xorg should make it harder to make the mistake of an accidental zap. ever heard of press Alt+F4 to

Re: Poll: Should Xorg change from using Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to something harder for users to press by accident?

2008-09-22 Thread Corbin Simpson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason Spiro wrote: Corbin Simpson mostawesomedude at gmail.com writes: ... Seriously, no. Your vote has been duly noted. Zap once, learn forever. No different than anything else, really; I still believe that Xorg should make it harder to

Re: Poll: Should Xorg change from using Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to something harder for users to press by accident?

2008-09-22 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 02:41:16AM +, Jason Spiro wrote: Problem: Many[1] users have killed X by accident.[2] Solution idea: Make it harder to kill X by accident. E.g. you could change the key sequence users must press. * Maybe require Control+Alt+Backspace then Control-Alt-Y.[3]

Re: How to implement alternate zap key idea (was: Re: Poll: Should Xorg change from using Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to?something harder for users to press by accident?)

2008-09-22 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 04:39:49AM +, Jason Spiro wrote: Thanks for the info. 1. So I guess when using evdev, a way to implement my Ctrl+Alt+Bksp then Ctrl+Alt+Y idea would be this?: Ctrl+Alt+Bksp should latch some new modifier called ctrl_alt_bksp_was_pressed, and Ctrl+Alt+Y should zap

Re: How to implement alternate zap key idea

2008-09-22 Thread Corbin Simpson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason Spiro wrote: Plus, due to the psychological effect called groupthink, people who would have said yes are now less likely to admit it to the entire list, since IIRC three have already said no and only one (me) has said yes. :( Ctrl+K+X