Re: Is interpolation of image-border specified by Render?

2008-10-18 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Clemens Eisserer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Maarten, Bilinear and nearest are standard texture unit properties, this should pose no difficulty for drivers. Good to know, thanks. I was a bit concerned when mixing both with src and mask. As far as the mask

Re: Is interpolation of image-border specified by Render?

2008-10-18 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Clemens Eisserer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Maarten, Do you have a test program or at least share the transformation matrix you're using, because i'm curious why it fails so badly. Yes I created one, http://pastebin.com/f729a71aa The testcase works

Re: Is interpolation of image-border specified by Render?

2008-10-18 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Where do these transformation matrices come from? They were created by the Java AffineTransform class. I just dumped it and copied it into the C file. I basically get an AffineTransformation instance (set by the user), inverse it and set it on the source. For the mask I do exactly the same,

Re: Is interpolation of image-border specified by Render?

2008-10-18 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Clemens Eisserer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where do these transformation matrices come from? They were created by the Java AffineTransform class. I just dumped it and copied it into the C file. I basically get an AffineTransformation instance (set by the

Re: Is interpolation of image-border specified by Render?

2008-10-18 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi Maarten, Do you have a test program or at least share the transformation matrix you're using, because i'm curious why it fails so badly. Yes I created one, http://pastebin.com/f729a71aa The testcase works perfectly with pixman (even with much higher scale), but on intel seems the mask has

Re: Is interpolation of image-border specified by Render?

2008-10-18 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi again, Sorry I completly forgot that the black pixels I see are caused by another bug in the intel-driver, which is only visible on i965. This bug causes areas out of source-surface-bounds to appear black instead of transparent, so if your driver does that properly you shouldn't see the

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-18 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:21:06AM -0700, William Tracy wrote: glibc chews up what, twenty megabytes? [citation needed] signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-18 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Thanks for the info. Will be nice if someone can quickly tell any pros and cons of using kdrive instead of Xorg, Pros: pretty much none. Cons: it's not Xorg. Pros: it's easier to understand and to work with. it doesn't have the module loader. Cons: it doesn't have the module

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-18 Thread Paul Bender
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: glibc chews up what, twenty megabytes? [citation needed] $ dpkg -s libc6 locales | grep ^Installed-Size: Installed-Size: 11452 Installed-Size: 11752 That has been built for normal desktop use. I use glibc in MiniMyth and it between 2MB and 3MB.