On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 18:19 -0800, Bipin George Mathew wrote:
Can XRender be hardware accelerated? If yes, how is it implemented in
XServer - Does it internally use OpenGL which is hardware-accelerated
OR does it have direct accl. support on the hardware?
See e.g. exa/exa_render.c .
--
I am experiencing a similar (I think) issue, reported as bug #19044.
cheers,
Stefano
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 05:56:07 Peter Clifton wrote:
If it's a known issue, fine, well and good.. otherwise let me know and
I'll dig you out some more info as to the exact config, and see if I can
be
Maarten Maathuis:
On 12/19/2008 08:42 PM, Carl Karsten wrote:
The placement logic is output driven, and doesn't take panning into
account. So you end up with strange overlap. If dual head + panning
was a goal you might consider fixing this. It doesn't seem trivial to
do from a quick look.
---
hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_acpi.c |8 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_acpi.c
b/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_acpi.c
index bb975cc..8e11f4a 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_acpi.c
+++
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 23/12/08 10:36 did gyre and gimble:
'Twas brillig, and Eric Anholt at 23/12/08 00:25 did gyre and gimble:
I've tagged it and uploaded it. The big update this release is the
modesetting userland support. I'm skipping the shortlog as it's noisy
with the
I'm tracking down a memory leak in xorg server 1.3.
With some work loads we see a reproducible memory leak in the xorg server.
I have got as far as finding that miRegionCreate is being called 46000
times in 5m and
the memory it allocates is not being freed. There are 17000 blocks
leaked from
Barry Scott wrote:
In miregion.c xfreeData macro: Why do a test on the size?
Doesn't this lead to a leak of a malloc'ed block of memory?
#define xfreeData(reg) if ((reg)-data (reg)-data-size)
xfree((reg)-data)
No. If the size is 0, then reg-data is miEmptyData (or the pixman
equivalent in
The attached patch fix the sis driver to compile with -Werror=format-security.
Thanks,
Ander
From 1b3f3fa2d2217de002764c3c38cf652ae3b264af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira an...@mandriva.com.br
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:11:30 -0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix compilation with
I don't know if you guys have seen this yet, but Phoronix did an
evaluation of the more recent Intel changes, and it was less than
favorable:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=intel_graphics_q408num=1
Devin
--
Devin J. Heitmueller
http://www.devinheitmueller.com
AIM:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
I don't know if you guys have seen this yet, but Phoronix did an
evaluation of the more recent Intel changes, and it was less than
favorable:
Tiago Vignatti schrieb:
f...@icram.de escreveu:
Which WindowManager is prefered to be used for Xi2 interactions?
http://www.mail-archive.com/xorg@lists.freedesktop.org/msg02804.html
Cheers,
So there is no candidate ATM?
That's what i read between the lines...
cheers, fl0
begin:vcard
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=intel_graphics_q408num=1
That test is wrong. You don't compare different drivers on different
distros. You compare them on the same distro.
I have found the leak.
At line 202 in miext/cw/cw_ops.c we have:
(*pBackingGC-ops-CopyArea)(pBackingSrc, pBackingDst,
pBackingGC, srcx, srcy, w, h,
dstx, dsty);
The RegionRec that is returned is lost.
Here is the stack trace of the allocation:
Breakpoint
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
I don't know if you guys have seen this yet, but Phoronix did an
evaluation of the more recent Intel changes, and it was less than
favorable:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=intel_graphics_q408num=1
They probably hit the no
On 23/12/2008 18:05, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Well, it's certainly possible that the driver became that much slower.
But doing the benchmark right would be so easy, yet Phoronix didn't do
it. All I need to do here, is simply remove the old driver and install
the new one and re-run the
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 13:25 -0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:
The attached patch fix the sis driver to compile with -Werror=format-security.
Some of those strings are predefined and visible in the patch you posted
(not a security issue). I certainly wouldn't apply this patch.
--
Eric
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 12:28 +, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 23/12/08 10:36 did gyre and gimble:
'Twas brillig, and Eric Anholt at 23/12/08 00:25 did gyre and gimble:
I've tagged it and uploaded it. The big update this release is the
modesetting userland
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
an...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Em Tuesday 23 December 2008 15:43:26 Eric Anholt escreveu:
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 13:25 -0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:
The attached patch fix the sis driver to compile with
better patch. On the other hand, if you guys feel there is nothing to be
fixed here I'll just keep the patch for the Mandriva package and let it go.
Change str to a macro and use that:
#define MSG_SEP **\n
...
xf86DrvMsg(pScrn-scrnIndex,
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=intel_graphics_q408num=1
That test is wrong. You don't compare different drivers on different
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
better patch. On the other hand, if you guys feel there is nothing to be
fixed here I'll just keep the patch for the Mandriva package and let it go.
Change str to a macro and use that:
#define MSG_SEP
'Twas brillig, and Ander Conselvan de Oliveira at 23/12/08 18:10 did
gyre and gimble:
Em Tuesday 23 December 2008 15:43:26 Eric Anholt escreveu:
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 13:25 -0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:
The attached patch fix the sis driver to compile with
-Werror=format-security.
2008/12/23 Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk:
I have found the leak.
isn't it simpler to update the xorg-server version?! 1.3 one is rather
old and probably
a memory leak bug would have been already discovered and fixed by now.
--
dott. ing. beso
'Twas brillig, and Eric Anholt at 23/12/08 17:45 did gyre and gimble:
Yeah, you need gdb output for the backtrace to be really useful. There
have been a couple of crashes reported with TexImage recently, but I
guess the could be related to the fix that idr did since you're not
running current
Folks-
I just moved from Ubuntu 8.04 (32 bit) to Gentoo (64 bit) on my
Thinkpad t61p. After doing so, I've had X crash when toggling xine to
fullscreen (which wasn't happening in ubuntu). This happens with both
amd64 and ~amd64 versions of the intel driver. I guess I'm asking if
there are
On Monday 22 December 2008, Dave Airlie wrote:
[resend, heavily snipped for readability]
This is a pre-release of what will be called xf86-video-ati 6.9.1
Pre-release notes:
This contains a lot of bugfixes/enhancements, highlights include
Output support for all radeon chips from r100 to rv730
Hi,
Just built the 1.6 branch + recent mesa snapshot and other such stuff.
It seems to be stable enough just now, but one thing that's been
affected is how the mouse positions itself to top-left after a certain
operations.
So far I've found odd behaviour when doing:
* Compiz cube dragging
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:29:38 -0500
From: Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
To: Shunichi Fuji palgl...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 6.9.0.91 - release candidate
On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Shunichi Fuji wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:13:58
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:56 PM, m h sesqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:51 PM, m h sesqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Mihai Donțu mihai.do...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 23 December 2008, m h wrote:
Folks-
Hmmm, thanks all for the responses. Perhaps
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Shunichi Fuji palgl...@gmail.com wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:29:38 -0500
From: Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
To: Shunichi Fuji palgl...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 6.9.0.91 - release candidate
On
30 matches
Mail list logo
