On 02/25/2010 04:40 PM, Eamon Walsh wrote:
On 02/25/2010 06:31 PM, Harald Braumann wrote:
Hi,
xserver fails to build, if selinux is enabled (git master as of today).
Affected are all the servers, except xfree86 (hw/{dmx,kdrive,vfb,xnest},
didn't test quartz and xwin). The problem seems to be, t
Latest HEAD fails to build with SELinux enabled.
Below is a fix that worked for me. not sure if its
legit or not(please look and review).
libpixman-1.so /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so /usr/lib/libaudit.so -lwrap -lm -lrt
../../Xext/.libs/libXext.a(xselinux_ext.o): In function `SELinuxExtensionInit':
xselinu
On 02/25/2010 06:31 PM, Harald Braumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> xserver fails to build, if selinux is enabled (git master as of today).
> Affected are all the servers, except xfree86 (hw/{dmx,kdrive,vfb,xnest},
> didn't test quartz and xwin). The problem seems to be, that the linker
> flag for selinux is
Hi,
xserver fails to build, if selinux is enabled (git master as of today).
Affected are all the servers, except xfree86 (hw/{dmx,kdrive,vfb,xnest},
didn't test quartz and xwin). The problem seems to be, that the linker
flag for selinux is missing. If I add -lselinux to *_LDADD in the
Makefiles,
this is new:
kernel: [ 92.899961] pci :01:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level,
low) -> IRQ 16
[ 93.019936] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
[ 93.097704] [drm] radeon defaulting to userspace modesetting.
[ 93.100104] [drm] Initialized radeon 1.32.0 20080528 for
:01:00.0 on minor
I would use strace to get a low-level view of what is going on.
When the X server is in that 20 second state run:
strace -tt -f -p PID_OF_X
if it is not busy doing system calls then you might need
to connect to the Xorg using gdb and then step to see
what is going on:
gdb -p PID_OF_X
Pat
Hi All,
First I hope this is the correct list to post to, if not then please
point me in the right direction.
I am trying to get the X.Org xserver running on an x86 platform with
intel 945GME graphics. It is for an embedded motherboard
(http://www.axiomtek.com/products/ViewProduct.asp?view=4
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:19:26PM +, Steffen Schaumburg wrote:
> I propose the following actions:
> - Unless it's definitely a complete waste of time civil as well as
> criminal charges should be brought by Xorg against eBay, as far as this
> is possible without undue costs or risks to Xorg. R
On Feb 25, 10 03:38:42 -0800, Barton C Massey wrote:
> Sorry, that previous paragraph wasn't as clear as it could
> be. At the beginning of 2009, Keith stepped down from the
> Board. He then ran again and was elected at the beginning
> of 2010. Welcome back, Keith!
Ah, yes, this absolutely make
In message <20100225105531.ga26...@suse.de> you wrote:
> On Feb 20, 10 15:01:50 -0800, Barton C Massey wrote:
> > The 2009 Board election was once again delayed, and
> > completed in mid-February 2010. This is unfortunate,
> > and further work needs to be done to ensure that the
> >
On Feb 20, 10 15:01:50 -0800, Barton C Massey wrote:
> The 2009 Board election was once again delayed, and
> completed in mid-February 2010. This is unfortunate,
> and further work needs to be done to ensure that the
> 2010 and ongoing elections can be held in a timely and
> re
11 matches
Mail list logo